Skip to content
CancerIndex

Publication

Prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with different types of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors not recorded

PLoS One2014PMID 25171497PMC4149366stubpubmedProvenance
Source
PubMed
Retrieved
Sep 8, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Run
ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
Published

Abstract

Abstract (excerpt)

Only the opening of the abstract is shown; abstract text may carry publisher copyright.

Data not yet available

No abstract stored. Read on PubMed

Linked entities

Linked entities (3)

How each link was made (MeSH, dictionary, registry reference, curation…) and whether it has been validated. Candidate links are not counted in entity statistics.

Validated 3

Curated evidence

Evidence citing this paper (1)

civicProvenance
Source
CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer
Dataset
CIViC evidence items
Version
civic-2026-09-08
Retrieved
Sep 8, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Evidence
expert curation
License
CC0 1.0
PMID
25171497
Run
ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
Open at source
CuratedShowing 1–1 of 1 evidence items · levels, directions and significance as curated at the source; each row links to its CIViC record.
TherapyCancerTypeLevelDirection · significanceRating (1–5)StatusEvidenceSource
FGFR1 Amplification1
(prognostic)Malignant NeoplasmALIASPrognosticBSupports Poor Outcome4accepted
EID685

Meta-Analysis on prognostic value of FGFR1 amplification in different types of cancer shows significantly worse overall survival for patients with FGFR1 and FGFR2 amplification. However, larger studie… (full text at CIViC)

PMID 25171497 · Chang et al., 2014 · Open in CIViC

civic