Skip to content
CancerIndex

Publication

BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: potential relationships to clinical response to HSP90 inhibitors.

Authors not recorded

Mol Cancer Ther2008PMID 18375819stubpubmedProvenance
Source
PubMed
Retrieved
Sep 8, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Run
ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
Published

Abstract

Abstract (excerpt)

Only the opening of the abstract is shown; abstract text may carry publisher copyright.

Data not yet available

No abstract stored. Read on PubMed

Linked entities

Linked entities (4)

How each link was made (MeSH, dictionary, registry reference, curation…) and whether it has been validated. Candidate links are not counted in entity statistics.

Validated 4

Curated evidence

Evidence citing this paper (1)

civicProvenance
Source
CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer
Dataset
CIViC evidence items
Version
civic-2026-09-08
Retrieved
Sep 8, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Evidence
expert curation
License
CC0 1.0
PMID
18375819
Run
ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
Open at source
CuratedShowing 1–1 of 1 evidence items · levels, directions and significance as curated at the source; each row links to its CIViC record.
TherapyCancerTypeLevelDirection · significanceRating (1–5)StatusEvidenceSource
NRAS G13D1
TanespimycinMelanomaPredictiveCSupports Sensitivity Response2accepted
EID21

Likely due to increased reliance of mutant NRAS on HSP90 for stabilization, inhibition of HSP90 by 17-AAG was shown to be effective in a patient with metastatic malignant melanoma with an NRAS G13D mu… (full text at CIViC)

PMID 18375819 · Banerji et al., 2008 · Open in CIViC

civic