Variant · Amplification
CCNE1 Amplification
CI-VAR-00000200Explore in graph →CIViC 187
Curated evidence
Evidence by cancer (9 items)
Grouped by cancer context first, then therapy. The same variant can be sensitizing in one cancer and irrelevant in another — contexts are never merged. 50 items per page; a cancer group may continue on the next page.
- Source
- CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer
- Dataset
- CIViC evidence items
- Version
- civic-2026-09-08
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Evidence
- expert curation
- License
- CC0 1.0
- PMID
- 40169546
- Run
- ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
| Molecular profile | Therapy | Type | Level | Direction · significance | Rating (1–5) | Status | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endometrial Carcinoma1 | ||||||||
| CCNE1 Amplification | Camonsertib + LunresertibCombination | Predictive | D | Supports Sensitivity Response | 3 | accepted | EID12762In endometrial carcinoma (EMCA) preclinical models, CCNE1 amplification predicted synergistic sensitivity to lunresertib (RP-6306) + camonsertib (RP-3500), with ~80% growth inhibition at low-dose comb… (full text at CIViC) PMID 40169546 · Xu et al., 2025 · Open in CIViC | civic |
| Endometrial Serous Adenocarcinoma1 | ||||||||
| CCNE1 Amplification | Fadraciclib + TaselisibCombination | Predictive | D | Supports Sensitivity Response | 3 | submitted | EID10181 | |
ClinVar
Clinical significance (0)
ClinVar interpretations are shown as structured records — significance, review status, star rating, conditions — never flattened into one word.
Data not yet available