Clinical trial · Interventional
Sequential vs Upfront Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Large Resectable or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Sequential vs Upfront Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Large Resectable and/or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. The INTENS Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
2 different treatment schedules may be used for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and taxotere. The most optimal sequence- concurrent or sequential- is however unclear. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with AC followed by T(adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, taxotere) versus TAC ( with upfront T) in patient with large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | Malignant Breast Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (3)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide | Drug | Cyclophosphamide | ALIAS |
| Docetaxel | Drug | Docetaxel | ALIAS |
| Doxorubicin | Drug | Doxorubicin | ALIAS |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- A
- description
- Cycles 1-4 q 3 weeks: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide Cycles 5-8 q 3 weeks: docetaxel
- interventionNames
- Drug: Doxorubicin
- Drug: Cyclophosphamide
- Drug: Docetaxel
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- B
- description
- Cycles 1-6 q 3 weeks: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel
- interventionNames
- Drug: Doxorubicin
- Drug: Cyclophosphamide
- Drug: Docetaxel
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- The pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 70 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Women presenting with large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer (T2 ≥3 cm, T3, or T4, and/or LN positive) * Measurable disease (breast and/or lymph nodes) * No prior surgery other than biopsy and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy * Age ≥18 years and age ≤70 years * Karnofsky Performance score ≥70% * Estrogen and/or progesterone receptor analysis performed on the primary tumour in the biopsy material * In case the tumor is ER/PgR ³ 50% positive, (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy in stead of chemotherapy should be considered (e.g. in TEAM II study) * Her2/neu receptor analysis performed on the primary tumour in the biopsy material * Adequate bone marrow function (within 14 days prior to registration): WBC ≥3.0 x 109/l, neutrophils ≥1.5 x 109/l, platelets ≥100 x 109/l * Adequate liver function (within 4 weeks prior to start treatment): bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (UNL) range, ALAT and/or ASAT ≤2.5 x UNL, Alkaline Phosphatase ≤5 x UNL * Adequate renal function (within 4 weeks prior to start treatment): the calculated creatinine clearance should be ≥50 mL/min * Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up * Written informed consent according to the local Ethics Committee requirements Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with advanced pulmonary disease of any cause (oxygen dependent)- Peripheral neuropathy \> grade 2 whatever the cause * Serious other diseases as recent myocardial infarction, clinical signs of cardiac failure or clinically significant arrythmias * Evidence of distant metastases (M1) * Patients with a history of breast cancer * Patients with a history of another malignancy (except basal cell skin carcinoma and carcinoma-in-situ of the uterine cervix) within 5 years of study entry- Pregnant or lactating women, or potentially fertile women not using adequate contraception
References
Publications (2)
- DERIVEDVriens BEPJ, Vriens IJH, Aarts MJB, van Gastel SM, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Smilde TJ, van Warmerdam LJC, van Spronsen DJ, Peer PGM, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Breast Cancer Trialists' Group of the Netherlands (BOOG). Improved survival for sequentially as opposed to concurrently delivered neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;165(3):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4364-8. Epub 2017 Jul 3. PMID 28674765
- DERIVEDVriens BE, de Vries B, Lobbes MB, van Gastel SM, van den Berkmortel FW, Smilde TJ, van Warmerdam LJ, de Boer M, van Spronsen DJ, Smidt ML, Peer PG, Aarts MJ, Tjan-Heijnen VC; INTENS Study Group. Ultrasound is at least as good as magnetic resonance imaging in predicting tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;52:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 30. PMID 26650831