Skip to content
CancerIndex

Publication

Utility of FOS as diagnostic marker for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.

Authors not recorded

Virchows Arch2020PMID 31768625PMC7085481stubpubmedProvenance
Source
PubMed
Retrieved
Sep 8, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Run
ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
Published

Abstract

Abstract (excerpt)

Only the opening of the abstract is shown; abstract text may carry publisher copyright.

Data not yet available

No abstract stored. Read on PubMed

Linked entities

Linked entities (3)

How each link was made (MeSH, dictionary, registry reference, curation…) and whether it has been validated. Candidate links are not counted in entity statistics.

Validated 3

Curated evidence

Evidence citing this paper (1)

civicProvenance
Source
CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer
Dataset
CIViC evidence items
Version
civic-2026-09-08
Retrieved
Sep 8, 2026
Layer
normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
Evidence
expert curation
License
CC0 1.0
PMID
31768625
Run
ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
Open at source
CuratedShowing 1–1 of 1 evidence items · levels, directions and significance as curated at the source; each row links to its CIViC record.
TherapyCancerTypeLevelDirection · significanceRating (1–5)StatusEvidenceSource
FOS Rearrangement1
(diagnostic)OsteoblastomaDiagnosticBSupports Positive3accepted
EID11786

The study evaluated FOS and FOSB immunohistochemistry (IHC) in osteoid osteoma (n=23), osteoblastoma (n=22), and other bone tumor types to gauge the specificity of FOS/FOSB IHC for diagnosing these tu… (full text at CIViC)

PMID 31768625 · Lam et al., 2020 · Open in CIViC

civic