Variant
KIT Exon 11 Mutation
CI-VAR-00000990Explore in graph →CIViC 66
Curated evidence
Evidence by cancer (18 items)
Grouped by cancer context first, then therapy. The same variant can be sensitizing in one cancer and irrelevant in another — contexts are never merged. 50 items per page; a cancer group may continue on the next page.
- Source
- CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer
- Dataset
- CIViC evidence items
- Version
- civic-2026-09-08
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Evidence
- expert curation
- License
- CC0 1.0
- PMID
- 16551858
- Run
- ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
| Molecular profile | Therapy | Type | Level | Direction · significance | Rating (1–5) | Status | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor14 | ||||||||
| KIT Exon 11 Mutation | (prognostic) | Prognostic | B | Does Not Support N/A | 3 | accepted | EID53There is no significant association between wildtype KIT or KIT mutations in exon 9 or 11 in survival among GIST patients. PMID 16551858 · Wardelmann et al., 2006 · Open in CIViC | civic |
| KIT Exon 11 Mutation | (diagnostic) | Diagnostic | B | Supports Positive | 2 | accepted | EID225KIT mutation is associated with larger, more invasive tumors, greater pathologic histology and older patients compared to tumors with wildtype KIT. PMID 10485475 · Taniguchi et al., 1999 · Open in CIViC | civic |
| KIT Exon 11 Mutation | (prognostic) | Prognostic | ||||||
ClinVar
Clinical significance (0)
ClinVar interpretations are shown as structured records — significance, review status, star rating, conditions — never flattened into one word.
Data not yet available