Variant · Structural
BRAF intron 10 rearrangement
CI-VAR-00004976Explore in graph →CIViC 2226
Curated evidence
Evidence by cancer (2 items)
Grouped by cancer context first, then therapy. The same variant can be sensitizing in one cancer and irrelevant in another — contexts are never merged. 50 items per page; a cancer group may continue on the next page.
- Source
- CIViC — Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer
- Dataset
- CIViC evidence items
- Version
- civic-2026-09-08
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Evidence
- expert curation
- License
- CC0 1.0
- PMID
- 29320312
- Run
- ING-CIVIC-20260908-000001
| Molecular profile | Therapy | Type | Level | Direction · significance | Rating (1–5) | Status | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malignant Neoplasm1 | ||||||||
| BRAF intron 10 rearrangement | Vemurafenib | Predictive | C | Does Not Support Sensitivity Response | 2 | accepted | EID5974The phase 2a MyPathway study assigned patients with HER2, EGFR, BRAF or SHH alterations to treatment with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, erlotinib, vemurafenib, or vismodegib, respectively Of 26 patient… (full text at CIViC) PMID 29320312 · Hainsworth et al., 2018 · Open in CIViC | civic |
| Melanoma1 | ||||||||
| BRAF intron 10 rearrangement | Dabrafenib + VemurafenibSubstitutes | Predictive | B | Supports Resistance | 3 | accepted | EID6400In a retrospective study of 44 relapsed melanoma patients harboring BRAF V600E or V600K (known BRAF inhibitor sensitizing mutations), MAPK pathway reactivation mechanisms were implicated in acquired r… | |
ClinVar
Clinical significance (0)
ClinVar interpretations are shown as structured records — significance, review status, star rating, conditions — never flattened into one word.
Data not yet available