Clinical trial · Observational
NOMAD-GI: Molecular-guided Non-operative Management and Organ Preservation Strategy After Precision Therapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers
Safety and Efficacy of Molecular-guided Non-operative Management and Organ Preservation Strategy After Precision Therapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Single-center Bidirectional Cohort Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The NOMAD-GI study is a single-center, bidirectional cohort study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of molecular biomarker-guided non-operative management (NOM) and organ preservation strategies after precision therapy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Patients with actionable molecular biomarkers, including dMMR/MSI-H, POLE mutation, PD-L1 high expression, tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H), Epstein-Barr virus positivity (EBV+), HER2 positivity, CLDN18.2 positivity, and other actionable genomic alterations, will be enrolled. After immune checkpoint inhibitor or targeted therapy, patients achieving favorable clinical responses will undergo multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation and receive either non-operative management, local treatment, or radical surgery according to individualized treatment decisions. The study aims to establish a molecular-driven organ preservation paradigm for gastrointestinal cancers and evaluate whether NOM can provide comparable oncological outcomes while improving functional outcomes and quality of life.
Conditions
Conditions (5)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal Cancer | Malignant Colorectal Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Esophageal Cancer | Malignant Esophageal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
| Gastric Cancer | Malignant Gastric Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Gastrointestinal Cancer | Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- Molecular-guided NOM/Organ Preservation Cohort
- description
- Patients receiving molecular-guided precision therapy followed by multidisciplinary evaluation and managed with: * Watch-and-wait strategy; * Endoscopic resection; * Local excision; * Other organ-preserving approaches.
- label
- Radical Surgery Cohort
- description
- Patients receiving radical surgical resection after precision therapy. Procedures include: * Radical gastrectomy; * Radical colorectal resection; * Esophagectomy. Participants will not be assigned to a treatment group by the study. The cohort classification will be based on the treatment strategy actually received after precision therapy and MDT evaluation.
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- 3-Year Organ Preservation Success Rate Without Radical Surgery
- timeFrame
- 3 years after initiation of the non-operative management or organ-preservation strategy
- description
- The proportion of participants who remain free from radical surgical resection and maintain the originally targeted organ at 3 years after initiation of the non-operative management or organ-preservation strategy. Organ preservation success will be assessed using clinical records, imaging, endoscopic evaluation, pathological evaluation when applicable, and subsequent treatment records. Measure: Percentage of participants Unit of Measure: Percentage
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults aged 18 years or older at the time of study enrollment. 2. Histologically confirmed gastrointestinal malignancy, including gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, esophageal cancer, or colorectal cancer. 3. Presence of at least one molecular biomarker that may support selection of precision therapy, including but not limited to: * Mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H); * Pathogenic or likely pathogenic POLE or POLD1 mutation; * High programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS), when applicable to the tumor type and treatment strategy; * Tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H); * Epstein-Barr virus-positive status (EBV-positive), when applicable; * Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity; * Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) positivity; * Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) alteration; * Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) amplification or other actionable MET alteration; * Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion; * Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog G12C (KRAS G12C) mutation; * Other clinically actionable molecular alterations recognized according to contemporary clinical practice. 4. Receipt of molecular biomarker-guided precision therapy before assessment for non-operative management or organ-preservation strategy. Precision therapy may include immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, targeted therapy, or a combination of systemic therapies according to the participant's tumor type, molecular profile, clinical stage, and standard clinical practice. 5. After completion or adequate exposure to precision therapy, achievement of a favorable clinical response that may support consideration of non-operative management or organ-preservation strategy, including clinical complete response (cCR), near-complete response (near-cCR), major tumor regression, or other predefined favorable response categories. 6. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation has been performed to determine whether non-operative management, local treatment, organ-preservation strategy, or radical surgery is appropriate. 7. Adequate clinical information is available for assessment of treatment response, including appropriate imaging, endoscopic evaluation, pathological evaluation, or other clinically indicated examinations. 8. Ability and willingness to comply with the predefined surveillance and follow-up schedule. 9. For the prospective cohort, written informed consent is obtained before enrollment and study-specific data collection. 10. For the retrospective cohort, eligible clinical data are available in the institutional medical records and may be used according to institutional ethics approval and applicable regulations. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Uncontrolled progressive metastatic disease or clinical deterioration that precludes evaluation for the study treatment strategy. 2. Patients who are unable to undergo appropriate clinical, radiological, endoscopic, or pathological assessment required for response evaluation or follow-up. 3. Previous treatment history or concurrent medical conditions that, in the judgment of the multidisciplinary team, preclude reliable assessment of tumor response or implementation of the predefined surveillance strategy. 4. Severe comorbidities or medical conditions that make continued follow-up or additional treatment evaluation clinically inappropriate. 5. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the predefined follow-up schedule. 6. Withdrawal of informed consent for prospective participants. 7. Insufficient clinical information to determine eligibility, treatment response, treatment strategy, or follow-up outcomes. 8. Patients with conditions that require immediate radical surgery or other urgent treatment according to multidisciplinary clinical assessment and who cannot safely undergo the predefined study evaluation.
References
Publications (1)
- BACKGROUND[1] SUNG H, FILHO A M, LAVERSANNE M, et al. Global cancer statistics 2024: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 34 cancers in 186 countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2026, 76(4): e70090. [2] SUN K X, LI L, WANG S M, et al. [Cancer incidence and mortality across diverse geographical regions in China, 2024] [J]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 2026, 48(3): 400-12. [3] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer (Version 2.2026). Published March 2026. Accessed August 8, 2026. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?id=1428 [J]. [4] FOKAS E, APPELT A, GLYNNE-JONES R, et al. International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer [J]. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2021, 18(12): 805-16. [5] HABR-GAMA A, PEREZ R O, NADALIN W, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results [J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(4): 711-7; discussion 7-8. [6] MUZNY D M, BAINBRIDGE M N, CHANG K, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer [J]. Nature, 2012, 487(7407): 330-7. [7] SADANANDAM A, LYSSIOTIS C A, HOMICSKO K, et al. A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy [J]. Nat Med, 2013, 19(5): 619-25. [8] BASS A J, THORSSON V, SHMULEVICH I, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma [J]. Nature, 2014, 513(7517): 202-9. [9] LE D T, URAM J N, WANG H, et al. PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(26): 2509-20. [10] LE D T, DURHAM J N, SMITH K N, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade [J]. Science, 2017, 357(6349): 409-13.