Clinical trial · Interventional
Suprapapillary Metal Stent vs. Routine Transpapillary Drainage in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction (SMART-B Trial)
Randomized Clinical Trial of Suprapapillary Drainage With Metal Stent vs. Routine Internal-External Transpapillary Drainage in Patients With Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is a condition in which the bile ducts near the liver become blocked due to cancer. This blockage can lead to jaundice (yellowing of the skin and eyes), itching, infection, and impaired liver function. To relieve the obstruction, doctors commonly perform procedures to drain bile and restore its flow. There are different techniques available for biliary drainage. One common method is percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage, in which a catheter is placed through the liver and across the natural opening of the bile duct into the intestine. Another approach is percutaneous suprapapillary drainage using a self-expanding metal stent, which allows bile to drain without crossing into the intestine and may reduce the risk of contamination and infection. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which of these two techniques is safer or more effective for patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. Some studies suggest that avoiding manipulation of the intestinal opening of the bile duct may reduce complications such as infection, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking. The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous suprapapillary drainage with a self-expanding metal stent versus routine percutaneous transpapillary internal-external drainage in patients with malignant proximal biliary obstruction. The study aims to compare the rate of drainage-related complications between the two techniques, as well as to evaluate treatment success, stent patency, and the need for reintervention. In addition, in patients with potentially resectable disease undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, the study will assess and compare surgical outcomes between the two approaches. The results of this study may help determine the safest and most effective drainage strategy for these patients and improve future clinical decision-making.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bile Duct Neoplasms | Bile Duct Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | Cholangiocarcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Malignant Biliary Obstruction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with self-expanding metal stent | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Percutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Transpapillary internal-external drainage
- description
- Participants undergo percutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage with placement of a catheter across the obstruction and through the papilla into the duodenum, according to standard institutional practice.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Percutaneous transpapillary internal-external biliary drainage
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Suprapapillary Self-Expanding Metal Stent Drainage
- description
- Participants undergo percutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with placement of a self-expanding metal stent across the obstruction without crossing the papilla.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Percutaneous suprapapillary biliary drainage with self-expanding metal stent
Primary outcomes (5)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \>18 years. 2. Malignant proximal biliary obstruction on imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography) with histopathological confirmation or high clinical and radiological suspicion. 3. Total bilirubin \> 3 mg/dL. 4. Patients not candidates for potentially curative surgical resection due to locally advanced disease, metastatic disease, or inadequate clinical condition. 5. Patients with potentially resectable neoplasms, defined as the possibility of achieving complete resection (R0), who meet at least one of the following criteria: 5.1 Estimated future liver remnant \<40%, in whom percutaneous portal vein embolization of the side to be resected will also be indicated after initial drainage. 5.2 Prolonged jaundice with total bilirubin \>10 mg/dL for more than 14 days. 5.3 Malnutrition, defined as ≥10% unintentional weight loss or albumin \<3 g/dL, presumably attributable to cholestasis. 5.4 Indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Tumor with distal extension to the duodenal papilla, precluding suprapapillary drainage. 2. Prior biliary drainage procedure, either percutaneous (PTBD) or endoscopic (ERCP). 3. Acute cholangitis, clinically defined as fever (axillary temperature \>38°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count \>10,000/mm³). 4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy. 5. Iodinated contrast allergy not amenable to desensitization.
References
Publications (19)
- BACKGROUNDCoelen RJS, Roos E, Wiggers JK, Besselink MG, Buis CI, Busch ORC, Dejong CHC, van Delden OM, van Eijck CHJ, Fockens P, Gouma DJ, Koerkamp BG, de Haan MW, van Hooft JE, IJzermans JNM, Kater GM, Koornstra JJ, van Lienden KP, Moelker A, Damink SWMO, Poley JW, Porte RJ, de Ridder RJ, Verheij J, van Woerden V, Rauws EAJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, van Gulik TM. Endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;3(10):681-690. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30234-6. Epub 2018 Aug 17. PMID 30122355
- BACKGROUNDZhao XQ, Dong JH, Jiang K, Huang XQ, Zhang WZ. Comparison of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and endoscopic biliary drainage in the management of malignant biliary tract obstruction: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(1):137-45. doi: 10.1111/den.12320. Epub 2014 Sep 24. PMID 25040581
- BACKGROUNDWiggers JK, Groot Koerkamp B, Cieslak KP, Doussot A, van Klaveren D, Allen PJ, Besselink MG, Busch OR, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Gouma DJ, Kingham TP, van Gulik TM, Jarnagin WR. Postoperative Mortality after Liver Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Development of a Risk Score and Importance of Biliary Drainage of the Future Liver Remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):321-331.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.035. Epub 2016 Apr 5. PMID 27063572
- BACKGROUNDShim DJ, Gwon DI, Han K, Kim Y, Ko GY, Shin JH, Ko HK, Kim JH, Kim JW, Yoon HK, Sung KB. Percutaneous Metallic Stent Placement for Palliative Management of Malignant Biliary Hilar Obstruction. Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):597-605. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.597. Epub 2018 Jun 14. PMID 29962866
- BACKGROUNDRibero D, Zimmitti G, Aloia TA, Shindoh J, Fabio F, Amisano M, Passot G, Ferrero A, Vauthey JN. Preoperative Cholangitis and Future Liver Remnant Volume Determine the Risk of Liver Failure in Patients Undergoing Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.060. Epub 2016 Feb 13.