Clinical trial · Interventional
The Comparison Between M-E-BCS and C-O-BCS.
A Comparative Study of Minimal Accessory-Incision-Assisted Endoscopic Breast-Conserving Surgery With Minimal Auxiliary Incisions Versus Conventional Open Breast-Conserving Surgery: A National Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial (MECO-BCS)
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The study aims to evaluate differences in operative efficiency (e.g., operative time), economic effect, surgical safety (e.g., surgical complication rates), postoperative aesthetics (e.g., BREAST-Q scores, Harris scores, SCAR-Q scores and Ueda scores), and oncological safety (e.g., margin status, no local recurrence survival) between patients undergoing M-E-BCS and patients undergoing C-O-BCS.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | Malignant Breast Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional open breast-conserving surgery | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Minimal accessory-incision-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Intervention group
- description
- Minimal accessory-incision-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Minimal accessory-incision-assisted endoscopic breast-conserving surgery
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Control group
- description
- Conventional open breast-conserving surgery
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Conventional open breast-conserving surgery
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Local recurrence rates
- timeFrame
- Postoperative 5 years
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 70 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * female patients aged 18-70 years (inclusive); * preoperative pathological examination confirmed it as invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ; * both clinical and imaging examinations clearly indicated that the lesion was a single lesion confined within the gland, without invasion of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, pectoralis major muscle, or the nipple-areola complex; * tumors in the inner and outer quadrants (three classification method, as shown in Figure 2); * preoperative tumor size ≤3 cm (pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy if applicable); * the tumor is more than 2 cm away from the nipple (the distance is based on physical examination, with MRI and ultrasound as supplementary methods); * the patient has a clear intention to preserve the breast and can receive standard radiotherapy after the operation; * voluntary provision of informed consent. . Exclusion Criteria: * clinically or radiologically evaluated as multifocal or multicentric breast cancer, with diffuse suspicious calcification, long spiculated masses, extensive local resection unable to obtain sufficient negative margins or ideal shape; * persistent positive tumor margins, and resection cannot ensure negative margins after resection; * inflammatory breast cancer; * pregnant and lactating women; * previous history of breast cancer surgery (including patients with recurrence after ipsilateral breast-conserving surgery); * breast cancer genetic gene mutations (such as BRCA1/2 gene mutations); * preoperative severe underlying diseases that cannot tolerate general anesthesia and surgical procedures. * other situations that the researchers consider unsuitable for participation
References
Publications (12)
- RESULTSchumacher JR, Wiener AA, Greenberg CC, Hanlon B, Edge SB, Ruddy KJ, Partridge AH, Le-Rademacher JG, Yu M, Vanness DJ, Yang DY, Havlena J, Strand C, Neuman HB. Local/Regional Recurrence Rates After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients Enrolled in Legacy Trials of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (AFT-01). Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):841-845. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005776. Epub 2022 Dec 14. PMID 36521077
- RESULTLiang Y, Xu S. Nonliposuction Endoscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Through the Periareolar Incision. Surg Innov. 2020 Dec;27(6):570-579. doi: 10.1177/1553350620942983. Epub 2020 Jul 20. PMID 32687735
- RESULTMok CW, Lai HW. Endoscopic-assisted surgery in the management of breast cancer: 20 years review of trend, techniques and outcomes. Breast. 2019 Aug;46:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 20. PMID 31176887
- RESULTPatrianagara A, Hwei LRY. Endoscopy-assisted breast conservation surgery (E-BCS) vs conventional breast conservation surgery (C-BCS) technique for the management of early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Dis. 2023;42(1):383-393. doi: 10.3233/BD-230023. PMID 38108340
- RESULTLai HW, Chen ST, Liao CY, Mok CW, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Oncologic Outcome of Endoscopic Assisted Breast Surgery Compared with Conventional Approach in Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 3426 Primary Operable Breast Cancer Patients from Single Institute with and Without Propensity Score Matching. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7368-7380. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09950-8. Epub 2021 May 11. PMID 33974198
- RESULTTakahashi H, Fujii T, Nakagawa S, Inoue Y, Akashi M, Toh U, Iwakuma N, Takahashi R, Takenaka M, Fukuma E, Shirouzu K. Usefulness of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Surg Today. 2014 Nov;44(11):2037-44. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0767-2. Epub 2013 Oct 24. PMID 24150099