Clinical trial · Interventional
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms and Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the technical feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) in the treatment of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients who are not suitable candidates for surgical treatment or who refuse surgery. EUS-RFA, as a minimally invasive therapeutic option, may potentially reduce the need for intensive imaging surveillance, prevent further progression of these lesions, and serve as a bridging therapy in selected patients for whom surgical intervention may be considered in the future. At the same time, EUS-RFA could contribute to reducing overtreatment, thereby lowering the risk of complications associated with surgical procedures and leading to an overall reduction in healthcare costs. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety profile of EUS-RFA, including the incidence and severity of adverse events both in the early postoperative period and during the first year of follow-up, as well as to assess the long-term efficacy of EUS-RFA, including disease progression.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms | Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNET) | Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.85 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic lesions | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic solid lesions | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- EUS-guided RFA of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs)
- description
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) of pancreatic cystic neoplasms in inoperable patients or patients refusing surgery
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic lesions
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- EUS-guided RFA of solid pancreatic lesions
- description
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) of pancreatic solid lesions, including PNET and other non-neuroendocrine solid lesions (e.g., metastases such as renal cell carcinoma)
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic solid lesions
Primary outcomes (1)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Consensual indication to EUS-guided RFA treatment made in a multidisciplinary team * Capability of giving informed consent PCN Inoperability or refusal of surgery * Branch duct IPMN (BD-IPMN) with worrisome features: * Jaundice * High grade dysplasia or cancer * Solid mass/nodule \> 5mm * Main pancreatic duct dilation \> 10mm Or at least one (patients without comorbidities) or at least two (patient with comorbidities) of the following risk features: * CA 19-9\> 37 U/ml * Increase in size \> 5mm/year * Dilation of the main pancreatic duct between 5-10mm * Size ≥ 40mm * Symptoms (new onset of diabetes, acute pancreatitis) * Nodule \< 5mm Pancreatic NET * Size \< 2 cm * Histological proof in non-functional lesions/histological proof or clinical proof in functional lesions * 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT positive for a pancreatic lesion and negative for lymph nodes, liver, and other distant metastases * G1 or G2 (\<5 %) histology Exclusion Criteria: * Known bleeding disorder that cannot be sufficiently corrected with medication * Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued * Physical and/or psychological inability to understand the aims of the research and to adequately cooperate * Pregnancy * Inability to sign the informed consent
References
Publications (1)
- BACKGROUND1. Keter D, et al, Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2008;38:146-151, 2. Dumonceau J.M. et at, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017. Endoscopy. 2017;49:695-714. 3. Goldberg, S.N. et al, Hepatogastroenterology, 2001. 48(38): p. 359-67, 4. Goldberg, S.N. et al, Eur J Ultrasound, 2001. 13(2): p. 129-47., 5. Gazelle, G.S. et al., Radiology, 2000, 217(3): p. 633-46, 6. Laffan T.A. et al, AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):802-7, 7. Kromrey M.L. et al, Gut. 2018 Jan;67(1):138-145, 8. Fernández-del Castillo C et al, Arch Surg. 2003 Apr;138(4):427- 3; 9. Grützmann R et al, Oncologist. 2010;15(12):1294-309, 10. Choi SH,. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;15(10):1509-1520.e4. 11. Lawrence B et al, Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;40(1):111-34, 12. McKenna L.R. et al, Gland Surg 2014;3(4):258-275, 13. Nagtegaal ID et al, Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182-188, 14. Gomez-Rivera F et al, Am J Surg. 2007;193:460-513, 15. Tanaka, M. et al, Ann Surg Oncol 28, 1614-1624 (2021), 16. Anderson M.A et al, Am. J. Gastroenterol. (2000);95(9): pp. 2,271-2,277. 17. Heidsma CM et al, Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):888-891.18 Ho C.K. et al, HPB (Oxford), 2005;7(2):99-108, 19. Kos-Kudła B et al, J Neuroendocrinol. 2023 Dec;35(12):e13343, 20. Pai M et al, World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr 27;7(4):52-9, 21.Barthet M. et al, Endoscopy. 2019;51:836-842., 22. Barthet M.et al, Endosc. Int. Open. 2021;9:E1178-E1185., 23. Larghi A et al, Endosc Ultrasound. 2019;8:220-226 , 24. Lakhtakia S et al,Dig Endosc 2017; 29(4): 86- 494. 25 Armellini E et al, Endoscopy 2015; 47(Suppl 1 UCTN): E600-E601. 26. Rossi S et al, Pancreas 2014; 43(6): 938- 945, 27. Lakhtakia S et al, Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):234-9, 28 Napoléon B et al, Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98(3): 392.e1- 399.e1 29 Borrelli de Andreis F et al,Pancreatology 2023; 23(5): 543- 549. 30 Okasha H et al, A Gut 2024; 73: A146-A147