Clinical trial · Interventional
Intraoperative Rectal Lavage to Prevent Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
Laparoscopic Rectal Irrigation for the Prevention of Local Recurrence After Radical Resection of Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-controlled Clinical Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Brief Summaries Trial Purpose The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical trial is to evaluate whether intraoperative rectal irrigation during laparoscopic radical resection of low-to-mid rectal cancer reduces postoperative local recurrence rates compared to no irrigation. Secondary objectives include assessing overall survival, incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage, stenosis), and quality of life at 6 months (EORTC QLQ-C30 scale). Participants Will: * Undergo laparoscopic radical resection with or without rectal irrigation (based on randomization); * Follow standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols postoperatively; * Attend scheduled follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months post-surgery, including clinical evaluations, imaging (CT/MRI), laboratory tests (CEA), and questionnaire assessments; * Maintain a symptom diary and record rescue inhaler usage (if applicable).
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middle and Low Rectal Cancer | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Rectal Cancer Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal irrigation | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Experimental group
- description
- Laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer followed by irrigation of the rectal cavity with normal saline / povidone-iodine
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Rectal irrigation
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- control group
- description
- No irrigation of the rectal stump was performed after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer.
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Postoperative local recurrence rate
- timeFrame
- Within 3 years after radical resection of rectal cancer
- description
- The postoperative local recurrence rate following laparoscopic radical resection for mid-to-low rectal cancer is defined as the number of patients with recurrence divided by the total number of subjects.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 75 years old. * Pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma. * Mid-to-low rectal cancer with the tumor lower margin located ≤10 cm from the anal verge. * Underwent laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer with sphincter preservation. * Without concomitant multiple primary malignancies. * Adequate organ function. * Patients or their family members were able to understand the study protocol, willing to participate in this study, and provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Concomitant other malignancies or a history of prior malignancies. * Abdominal perineal resection (Miles' operation) or Hartmann's procedure. * Failure to open the peritoneal reflection during surgery. * History of previous pelvic floor surgery. * Emergency surgery due to bowel obstruction. * Severe hepatic, renal, cardiopulmonary, or coagulation dysfunction, or other severe comorbidities that render the patient unable to tolerate the procedure. * History of severe psychiatric disorders. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Any other clinical or laboratory conditions considered unsuitable for participation in the trial by the investigators.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available