Metabolic Flexibility in Patients With Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Cancer is considered a major global public health problem. It was estimated that in 2022 approximately 19.9 million new cancer cases were diagnosed worldwide, and this number is expected to increase over the next two decades to 28.0 million (1). Specifically, breast cancer (BC) represents the highest incidence worldwide, with approximately 2.3 million new cases diagnosed in 2022 (1). A higher incidence of BC is observed in developed countries, which may be due to high rates of obesity, alcohol and tobacco consumption, early onset of puberty, the use of contraceptives and hormonal therapies, low levels of physical activity, and giving birth at later ages (2,3). In addition to the factors mentioned above, hereditary factors and age also represent risk factors for cancer development (2,3). Finally, the presence of family members with breast and/or ovarian cancer carrying mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, among others, which increase the likelihood of tumor proliferation, as well as age over 40 years, also increase the probability of developing BC (2,3). Specifically, there is a molecular subtype that does not respond to hormonal receptors or HER2 and may be more aggressive and have fewer specific treatment options, known as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Metabolic flexibility (MF) is described as the ability of the body to adapt to energy demands in different contexts. During chemotherapy and after surgery, significant changes may occur, such as increased body fat, loss of muscle mass, cancer-related fatigue, metabolic alterations, and decreased quality of life. These changes may persist even years after treatment and may affect both well-being and recovery. It could therefore be suggested that metabolic flexibility in muscle fibers in patients with TNBC may be reduced, particularly in patients undergoing systemic treatment, with potential difficulties adapting to different intensities and energy demands in daily life. A decrease in muscle metabolic flexibility would also imply a reduction in muscle strength and physical function, significantly impairing quality of life. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to analyze muscle metabolic flexibility at different stages of early disease and to evaluate whether different types of exercise training can improve these outcomes. To achieve this, assessments will be conducted at four time points during the early stages of the disease: at diagnosis, after neoadjuvant treatment, after surgery, and following an exercise intervention. The assessments will include blood analyses, body composition measurements, cycling exercise tests to evaluate oxygen consumption and the utilization of fat and glucose, measurements of muscle strength, and questionnaires assessing fatigue and quality of life. After surgery, participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups for 12 weeks: a control group receiving general physical activity recommendations; a moderate-intensity cardiovascular exercise group focused on maximal fat oxidation; a high-intensity interval cardiovascular exercise group; and a progressive resistance training group. The final objective is to determine which type of exercise most effectively improves metabolic flexibility, muscle strength, body composition, and overall well-being. Participation in the study is voluntary and does not affect standard medical care. All assessments and training sessions will be supervised by qualified exercise professionals to ensure participant safety.

Sex

Female

Minimum age

20 Years

Maximum age

55 Years

Inclusion criteria:

* Female between 20-55 years of age.
* Confirmed histological new diagnosis of stage I to III triple-negative breast cancer and a candidate to receive systemic neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy +/- immunotherapy.
* Must not have started systemic treatment for the neoplastic disease.
* Participating in any external physical exercise program or sports activities during the experimental study phase.
* Inability to understand and provide written Informed Consent (IC)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Having neurological or orthopedic disease at the time of recruitment or during the study evaluation and intervention.
* Inability to understand Spanish language.
* Presenting absolute contraindications for performing a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) such as heart failure, myocarditis, acute pericarditis, severe aortic stenosis, aortic dissection, vascular toxicity, uncontrolled severe arterial hypertension, uncontrolled severe cardiac arrhythmias, pulmonary thromboembolism, or severe anemia.
* Have relative contraindications for performing a CPET such as bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias, moderate valvular stenosis, inability to perform physical or mental exertion, chronic infectious diseases, musculoskeletal disabilities, ventricular aneurysm, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, or severe arterial hypertension.

• BACKGROUNDWilliams MA, Haskell WL, Ades PA, Amsterdam EA, Bittner V, Franklin BA, Gulanick M, Laing ST, Stewart KJ; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):572-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185214. Epub 2007 Jul 16. PMID 17638929
• BACKGROUNDThompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS; American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf. No abstract available. PMID 23851406
• BACKGROUNDPaulo AC, Forjaz CLM, Mion D Jr, Silva GV, Barros S, Tricoli V. Blood Pressure Increase in Hypertensive Individuals During Resistance Training Protocols With Equated Work to Rest Ratio. Front Physiol. 2020 Jun 29;11:481. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00481. eCollection 2020. PMID 32714194
• BACKGROUNDFletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, Chaitman B, Eckel R, Fleg J, Froelicher VF, Leon AS, Pina IL, Rodney R, Simons-Morton DA, Williams MA, Bazzarre T. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001 Oct 2;104(14):1694-740. doi: 10.1161/hc3901.095960. No abstract available. PMID 11581152
• BACKGROUNDDavis SN, Tate D, Hedrington MS. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia and exercise-associated autonomic dysfunction. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2014;125:281-91; discussion 291-2. PMID 25125745
• BACKGROUNDDupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugue B. An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 26;9:403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00403. eCollection 2018.