This project will test ways to reduce stigma in healthcare settings so that more providers offer, and more patients receive, important anal sex-related HIV services, including anorectal sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, preventive medications, and cancer screening. By evaluating these stigma-reduction strategies in eight clinics in the Mississippi Delta, a region with high rates of HIV and STIs, the research team will learn whether and how these approaches work to improve access to care. The results will help guide healthcare systems in using the most effective methods to reduce stigma, making it easier for people to get prevention services and improving public health.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
Condition (as posted)
Mapped entity
Match
Confidence
Anal Cancer Squamous Cell
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Chlamydia
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Gonorrhea
—
UNRESOLVED
—
HIV
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Interventions
Interventions (1)
Intervention
Type
Mapped drug
Match
PEACHES 2.0 Implementation Strategies
Behavioral
—
UNRESOLVED
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
type
EXPERIMENTAL
label
PEACHES 2.0 Implementation Strategies
interventionNames
Behavioral: PEACHES 2.0 Implementation Strategies
Primary outcomes (1)
measure
Patient uptake of anorectal STI screening
timeFrame
Data will be collected monthly via the audit-and-feedback data dashboard. First data collection occurs just after month 1 of the Pre-Implementation period, continuing through Implementation and Maintenance periods, for a total of 36 months.
description
Clinics will extract deidentified patient level outcomes from the medical record system on a monthly basis. This data will be imported into an audit-and-feedback data dashboard developed by the PEACHES 2.0 team.
For patient uptake of anorectal STI screening, the number of anorectal STI screening orders per month among all STI orders in that same month will be calculated, and the slopes across the three 12-month data collection periods: Pre-Implementation, Implementation, and Maintenance periods, will be compared.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
Sex
All
Minimum age
18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:
Staff participants ("Strategy Recipients" and "Strategy Recipients")
* employed at one of eight Coastal Family Health Center clinics at the time of the survey
* over age 18 years old
Patient participants ("Patients")
* accessing sexual health services at one of eight Coastal Family Health Center clinics in the last 12 months
* over 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
* Staff or patients who are unable to provide informed consent (e.g., significant cognitive impairment)
* Individuals currently incarcerated or in state custody
* Patients whose only visits are for non-HIV, non-STI issues and who do not meet the EMR-based eligibility criteria above
References
Publications (20)
BACKGROUNDFixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute at the University of South Florida (FMHI Publication #231).
BACKGROUNDWright AJ, Zhang L, Howes E, Veall C, Corker E, Johnston M, Hastings J, West R, Michie S. Specifying how intervention content is communicated: Development of a Style of Delivery Ontology. Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Oct 12;8:456. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19899.1. eCollection 2023. PMID 39193088
BACKGROUNDCho E, Lyon AR, Tugendrajch SK, Marriott BR, Hawley KM. Assessing provider perceptions of training: Initial evaluation of the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness Scale. Implement Res Pract. 2022 Apr 5;3:26334895221086269. doi: 10.1177/26334895221086269. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. PMID 37091090
BACKGROUNDKutner BA, Wu Y, Balan IC, Meyers K. "Talking About it Publicly Made Me Feel Both Curious and Embarrassed": Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of a Stigma-Mitigation Training to Increase Health Worker Comfort Discussing Anal Sexuality in HIV Services. AIDS Behav. 2020 Jun;24(6):1951-1965. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02758-4. PMID 31858301
BACKGROUNDKutner BA, Perry NS, Stout C, Norcini Pala A, Paredes CD, Nelson KM. The Inventory of Anal Sex Knowledge (iASK): A New Measure of Sexual Health Knowledge Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males. J Sex Med. 2022 Mar;19(3):521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Jan 26. PMID 35090838
BACKGROUNDKutner BA, Simoni JM, King KM, Goodreau SM, Norcini Pala A, Creegan E, Aunon FM, Baral SD, Rosser BRS. Does Stigma Toward Anal Sexuality Impede HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States? A Structural Equation Modeling Assessment. J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):477-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
measure
Patient uptake of Doxy-PEP
timeFrame
Data will be collected monthly via the audit-and-feedback data dashboard. First data collection occurs just after month 1 of the Pre-Implementation period, continuing through Implementation and Maintenance periods, for a total of 36 months.
description
Clinics will extract deidentified patient level outcomes from the medical record system on a monthly basis. This data will be imported into an audit-and-feedback data dashboard developed by the PEACHES 2.0 team.
For patient uptake of Doxy-PEP, the number of first Doxy-PEP orders per month among all STI orders in that same month will be calculated, and the slopes across the three 12-month data collection periods: Pre-Implementation, Implementation, and Maintenance periods, will be compared.
measure
Patient uptake of PrEP
timeFrame
Data will be collected monthly via the audit-and-feedback data dashboard. First data collection occurs just after month 1 of the Pre-Implementation period, continuing through Implementation and Maintenance periods, for a total of 36 months.
description
Clinics will extract deidentified patient level outcomes from the medical record system on a monthly basis. This data will be imported into an audit-and-feedback data dashboard developed by the PEACHES 2.0 team.
For patient uptake of PrEP, the number of first PrEP prescriptions per month among all STI orders in that same month will be calculated, and the slopes across the three 12-month data collection periods: Pre-Implementation, Implementation, and Maintenance periods, will be compared.
measure
Patient uptake of anal cancer screening
timeFrame
Data will be collected monthly via the audit-and-feedback data dashboard. First data collection occurs just after month 1 of the Pre-Implementation period, continuing through Implementation and Maintenance periods, for a total of 36 months.
description
Clinics will extract deidentified patient level outcomes from their medical record system on a monthly basis. This data will be imported into an audit-and-feedback data dashboard developed by the PEACHES 2.0 team.
For patient uptake of anal cancer screening, the number of annual digital anorectal examination (DARE) with anal cytology performed among all patients with HIV aged ≥ 35 years will be calculated, and the slopes across the three 12-month data collection periods: Pre-Implementation, Implementation, and Maintenance periods, will be compared.
BACKGROUNDSherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-b. PMID 2035047
BACKGROUNDHuijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Dusseldorp E, Verheijden MW, van der Zouwe N, Middelkoop BJ, Crone MR. Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2014 Mar 19;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-33. PMID 24641907
BACKGROUNDWest, R., & Michie, S. (2020). A brief introduction to the COM-B Model of behaviour and the PRIME Theory of motivation. Qeios. https://doi.org/10.32388/ww04e6.2
BACKGROUNDKutner BA, King KM, Dorsey S, Creegan E, Simoni JM. The Anal Sex Stigma Scales: A New Measure of Sexual Stigma Among Cisgender Men Who have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep;24(9):2666-2679. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02824-2. PMID 32198561
BACKGROUNDPalinkas LA, Zatzick D. Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) in Pragmatic Clinical Trials of Mental Health Services Implementation: Methods and Applied Case Study. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Mar;46(2):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s10488-018-0909-3. PMID 30488143
BACKGROUNDHamilton AB, Finley EP. Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct;280:112516. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516. Epub 2019 Aug 10. PMID 31437661
BACKGROUNDSimoni JM, Beima-Sofie K, Amico KR, Hosek SG, Johnson MO, Mensch BS. Debrief Reports to Expedite the Impact of Qualitative Research: Do They Accurately Capture Data from In-depth Interviews? AIDS Behav. 2019 Aug;23(8):2185-2189. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-02387-3. PMID 30666522
BACKGROUNDSaldana, J. M. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
BACKGROUNDPatton, & M.Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?id=ovAkBQAAQBAJ
BACKGROUNDMiles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. M. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis (4 (Kindle)). SAGE Publications, Inc.
BACKGROUNDNich C, Carroll KM. Intention-to-treat meets missing data: implications of alternate strategies for analyzing clinical trials data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Oct 1;68(2):121-30. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00111-4. PMID 12234641
BACKGROUNDSchafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77. PMID 12090408
BACKGROUNDHedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (1997). Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 2(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.2.1.64