Clinical trial · Observational
Piecemeal Resection and Advanced Histology Independently Predict Local Recurrence After Colorectal Snare-based Endoscopic Resection: a Time-to-event Cohort Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The objective of this retrospective cohort observational study is to identify variables related to the recurrence of colorectal lesions after snare polypectomy resection in colonoscopies. It also aims to evaluate the safety of the procedure. The main questions to be answered are: * What endoscopic characteristics are most related to recurrence? * What adverse events are related to the procedure? The researchers will perform a chart analysis looking for demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological variables in order to identify which factors are most closely linked to the recurrence of previously resected lesions.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colo-rectal Cancer | Colon Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Local recurrence of the lesion at the site of the previous resection
- timeFrame
- Between the years 2023 and 2025.
- description
- Presence of a visible lesion at the scar site of a previous polypectomy, histologically confirmed as adenomatous, serrated, or neoplastic tissue, obtained by biopsy or new resection.
Secondary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Presence of metachronous adenoma
- timeFrame
- Between the years 2023 and 2025.
- description
- Development of a new adenomatous or serrated lesion at a site different from the area of previous resection, identified during follow-up colonoscopy and confirmed histologically.
- measure
- Adverse events related to the procedure
- timeFrame
- Between the years 2023 and 2025.
- description
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years at the time of polypectomy; * Underwent snare polypectomy, with or without the use of thermal energy (cold snare or hot snare), performed during the study period (2023-2025); * Procedure performed at a participating tertiary center, ensuring technical and record standardization; * Availability of histopathological examination of the resected lesion, allowing for adequate histological characterization; * Performance of at least one documented surveillance colonoscopy, with evaluation of the previous resection site; * Adequate recording of clinical and endoscopic variables necessary for analysis (lesion size, location, resection technique, etc.); Exclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing techniques other than loop polypectomy, such as: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), advanced mucosal resection not based on conventional loop, primary surgical resection of the lesion; * Absence of follow-up colonoscopy, making it impossible to assess the primary outcome (local recurrence); * Incomplete clinical, endoscopic, or histopathological data that prevent adequate classification of study variables; * Invasive lesions beyond the mucosa (invasive cancer with deep submucosal invasion) that have been referred for immediate surgical treatment without endoscopic follow-up; * Loss to follow-up before the first surveillance colonoscopy.
References
Publications (27)
- RESULTMohapatra S, Fukami N. Prevention of bleeding after EMR of colorectal lesions: when and how? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;7(2):109-110. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00463-5. No abstract available. PMID 35026166
- RESULTAlbeniz E, Montori S, Rodriguez de Santiago E, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Alvarez MA, Estremera-Arevalo F, Pohl H. Preventing Postendoscopic Mucosal Resection Bleeding of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;117(7):1080-1088. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001819. Epub 2022 May 4. PMID 35765907
- RESULTMack A, Mangira D, Moss A. Prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: Should we amend the 2017 ESGE Guideline? Endosc Int Open. 2020 Sep;8(9):E1111-E1114. doi: 10.1055/a-1196-1602. Epub 2020 Aug 31. No abstract available. PMID 32898199
- RESULTBurgess NG, Metz AJ, Williams SJ, Singh R, Tam W, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Sonson R, Bourke MJ. Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):651-61.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.049. Epub 2013 Oct 1. PMID 24090728
- RESULTMoss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Chen RY, Byth K. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1909-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.062. Epub 2011 Mar 8. PMID 21392504
- RESULTFacciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, Vendemiale G, Spada C, Costamagna G, Muscatiello N. Factors Associated With Recurrence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma After Endoscopic Resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1148-1154.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 19. PMID 27005802
- Andrisani G, Hassan C, Pizzicannella M, Pugliese F, Mutignani M, Campanale C, Valerii G, Barbera C, Antonelli G, Di Matteo FM. Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Dec;98(6):987-997.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 28.