Clinical trial · Interventional
The Impact of AI-Assisted Nursing Care Intervention Within the Enhanced Recovery Framework on Outcomes of Colorectal Surgery Patients
The Impact of AI-Powered Video-Based Discharge Education and Follow-up Intervention on Patient Outcomes and Home Care Management in Colorectal Surgery Patients Receiving Care in Line With the Postoperative Accelerated Recovery Protocol: A Mixed Methods Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, affecting a large number of people each year (Bray et al., 2022). Surgical intervention remains the gold standard in treatment. However, advances in surgical techniques and increased effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapies have brought sphincter-preserving surgeries to the forefront, reducing the need for stoma creation compared to the past (Jo \& Wilson, 2025; Wang et al., 2025). Even without stoma creation, these patients face complex care needs in the post-discharge period, including changes in bowel habits, nutritional management, and adaptation to physical activity (Wang et al., 2025). Difficult-to-manage complications carry a high risk of readmission to the hospital. Patients receive limited support during the transition from the hospital to home and at home (Storm et al., 2024). Patients and their families are often left alone to manage home care until routine follow-up appointments. Patients, especially those poorly prepared for discharge, may not know how to perform care practices at home or what to watch out for in case of complications. Situations that are well managed in the hospital can spiral out of control upon inadequate follow-up after the patient returns home, leading to unplanned readmissions. Insufficient postoperative patient follow-up can cause anxiety in patients, leading to readmissions due to the inability to manage the home care process effectively (Storm et al., 2024). Although accelerated recovery after surgery (ERAS) is known to shorten hospital stays (Gustafsson et al., 2025; Gustafsson et al., 2019), studies show varying results regarding readmissions, re-operations, developing complications, and survival (Coleman et al., 2006; Takchi et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2022). These variable results highlight the need for a structured discharge process and home care management for patients who undergo ERAS and are discharged home earlier. In the study by Takchi et al. (2020), a scheduled phone call was proposed as the final step in advanced recovery recommendations and presented as a pilot study. The study reported that each patient contacted reported at least one symptom and personal care need (Takchi et al., 2020). The scheduled phone calls proposed by Takchi et al. (2020) are an important monitoring mechanism in the recovery process; however, they are insufficient. Supporting this monitoring process with a structured discharge management and AI-powered digital video accessible to the patient at any time, extends the continuity of care to a digital dimension. It is reported that AI-powered multimedia tools, whose use is increasing with the transformation in health technologies today, reduce cognitive load by concretizing complex surgical processes with audiovisual materials and improve patients' self-care skills regardless of their health literacy level (Mendoza-Pinto et al., 2025). "Content prepared with generative artificial intelligence algorithms, in particular, increases the retention of information and the patient's digital health literacy compared to traditional educational materials (Zaretsky et al., 2024). This study aims to both structure the discharge and post-discharge follow-up process, which is included in ERAS protocols to a limited extent, and to increase the patient's readiness for discharge, improve patient outcomes, and facilitate home care management using AI-assisted educational videos. Thus, the study significantly points to a fourth step, which is included in ERAS guidelines in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative phases and is felt to be missing: the discharge and home follow-up process.
Conditions
Conditions (5)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Colo-rectal Cancer | Colon Neoplasm | PROBABILISTIC | 0.70 |
| Colorectal Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Enhanced Recovery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Home Care | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educational intervention | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Standard maintenance therapy | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Control Group
- description
- Routine information, standard care, and follow-up after hospital discharge.
- interventionNames
- Other: Standard maintenance therapy
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- intervention group
- description
- A structured, AI-powered, video-based discharge education program is supported by scheduled follow-up phone calls on days 3, 7, 10, and 30 post-surgery. An in-depth qualitative interview is also conducted on day 30.
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: Educational intervention
Primary outcomes (3)
- measure
- KATZ Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: Agreement to participate in the study Being 18 years of age or older Ability to communicate in Turkish No visual or hearing impairment No cognitive impairment Undergoing elective colorectal surgery in accordance with an accelerated postoperative recovery protocol Exclusion Criteria: Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria
References
Publications (10)
- BACKGROUNDMortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schafer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Group. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1209-29. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9582. Epub 2014 Jul 21. PMID 25047143
- BACKGROUNDJo A, Wilson MZ. From Diversion to Permanence: Trends in Ostomy Creation in Rectal Cancer Surgery. J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 12;14(6):1913. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061913. PMID 40142717
- BACKGROUNDWang S, Li AJ, Jiang HH, Lin Y, Ding HB. Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):107525. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.107525. PMID 40740930
- BACKGROUNDLee L, Eustache J, Baldini G, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fiore JF Jr, Feldman LS. Enhanced Recovery 2.0 - Same Day Discharge With Mobile App Follow-up After Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e812-e818. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004962. Epub 2021 Jun 2. PMID 34091514
- BACKGROUNDTakchi R, Williams GA, Brauer D, Stoentcheva T, Wolf C, Van Anne B, Woolsey C, Hawkins WG. Extending Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols to the Post-Discharge Setting: A Phone Call Intervention to Support Patients after Expedited Discharge after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):42-48. PMID 32077415
- BACKGROUNDGustafsson UO, Rockall TA, Wexner S, How KY, Emile S, Marchuk A, Fawcett WJ, Sioson M, Riedel B, Chahal R, Balfour A, Baldini G, de Groof EJ, Romagnoli S, Coca-Martinez M, Grass F, Brindle M, Hubner M. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations 2025. Surgery. 2025 Aug;184:109397. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109397. Epub 2025 Jun 29. No abstract available.