Clinical trial · Observational
Does Ultrasound Guidance Axillary Incision Improve Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Breast Cancer?
Does Using Ultrasound Guidance During Axillary Incision Improve Sentinel Lymph Node Detection Compared to Standard Methods in Breast Cancer Patients?
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 26, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260926-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This single-center randomized controlled trial evaluates whether detecting the first lymph node at the axillary entrance with ultrasound guidance, followed by a targeted axillary incision over the pencil-marked projection, improves sentinel lymph node identification compared to the conventional axillary hairline landmark. The study hypothesizes that this technique enables a smaller incision, minimizes tissue dissection, and reduces operative time.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Carcinoma | Breast Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| The standard axillary incision | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Ultrasound-guided axillary incision group | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- The ultrasound-guided axillary incision group.
- description
- In the ultrasound-guided axillary incision group, the incision is made parallel to the Langer lines under ultrasound guidance, targeting the projection of the first lymph node at the axillary entry.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Ultrasound-guided axillary incision group
- label
- The standard hairline axillary incision group
- description
- In the ultrasound-guided axillary incision group, the incision is made at the ultrasound-identified projection of the first lymph node at the axillary entry.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: The standard axillary incision
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Intraoperative assessment of surgical performance parameters.
- timeFrame
- Until completion of the sentinel lymph node procedure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * \* Patients with clinical stage T1-T3 disease (tumor ≤5 cm), pN0-pN1 (one to three regional lymph nodes with micrometastases or metastases), and M0 (no distant metastasis) are eligible. Post-neoadjuvant yT1-T3, yN0-yN1, and M0 status are also eligible. All patients are undergoing axillary staging. * Clinically negative axilla * Written informed consent must be obtained prior to inclusio Exclusion Criteria: * Younger than 18 years * Previous breast malignancy * Pregnancy * Pre-operative diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases * The presence of multiple clinically involved or suspicious lymph nodes * Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
References
Publications (5)
- BACKGROUNDFenech M, Burke T, Arnett G, Tanner A, Werder N. Sonographic localisation of lymph nodes suspicious of metastatic breast cancer to surgical axillary levels. J Med Radiat Sci. 2025 Mar;72(1):119-138. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.840. Epub 2024 Nov 17. PMID 39552171
- BACKGROUNDSuami H, Pan WR, Mann GB, Taylor GI. The lymphatic anatomy of the breast and its implications for sentinel lymph node biopsy: a human cadaver study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):863-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9709-9. Epub 2007 Nov 28. PMID 18043970
- BACKGROUNDGentilini OD, Botteri E, Sangalli C, Galimberti V, Porpiglia M, Agresti R, Luini A, Viale G, Cassano E, Peradze N, Toesca A, Massari G, Sacchini V, Munzone E, Leonardi MC, Cattadori F, Di Micco R, Esposito E, Sgarella A, Cattaneo S, Busani M, Dessena M, Bianchi A, Cretella E, Ripoll Orts F, Mueller M, Tinterri C, Chahuan Manzur BJ, Benedetto C, Veronesi P; SOUND Trial Group. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;9(11):1557-1564. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759. PMID 37733364
- BACKGROUNDVeronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, Costa A, de Cicco C, Geraghty JG, Luini A, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997 Jun 28;349(9069):1864-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01004-0. PMID 9217757
- BACKGROUNDTanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdes Olmos RA, Kroon BB. Anatomy and physiology of lymphatic drainage of the breast from the perspective of sentinel node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Mar;192(3):399-409. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00776-6. PMID 11245383