Clinical trial · Interventional
Individualised Endometrial Cancer Risk Stratification by Bayesian Prediction Model (ENDORISK), Optimizing Clinical Implementation
ENDORISK Clinical Implementation Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Rationale: Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, a Bayesian network model called ENDORISK was developed and validated in three external cohorts to improve preoperative risk stratification. The next step is to implement and evaluate whether use of the model improves daily clinical practice. Objective: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate whether implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice improves preoperative risk stratification. Study design: A stepped wedge non inferiority study in which two oncology regions will consecutively start implementation of ENDORISK with one year interval. The ENDORISK model will be filled in and used in preoperative treatment counselling. Results will be compared to current standard clinical care which is prospectively evaluated in both regions since March 2022 in the 'evaluation of care in endometrial cancer' study (2021-7400). Study population: all consecutive patients recently diagnosed with early stage EC who are eligible for surgical treatment, who understand Dutch and are able to fill in a digital or paper questionnaire can be included. Main study parameters/endpoints: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice by investigating: * The proportion of identified LNM in patients with lymph node staging (positive predictive value (PPV)) compared to standard care * Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care * Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care * Patients' disease- specific-, overall survival, and health-related quality of life compared to standard care * Patients' and doctors' use of and experiences with the ENDORISK-model * Impact of ENDORISK on regional care costs
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endometrial Cancer | Malignant Endometrial Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Control
- description
- The control arm is a group of patients from our previous 'evaluation of care' study which underwent standard care for endometrial cancer between march of 2022 and the start of the ENDORISK-I study. This group serves as a control group for the intervention arm.
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Intervention
- description
- The intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk.
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.
Primary outcomes (3)
- measure
- Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 45 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed with early stage (FIGO stage I-II) endometrial carcinoma (every grade permitted) * Eligible for primary surgical treatment (neo-adjuvant therapy is permitted) Exclusion Criteria: * Unable to give informed consent * No understanding of Dutch or English language * Rare types of endometrial cancer, such as endometrial stroma cell sarcoma
References
Publications (3)
- BACKGROUNDVinklerova P, Ovesna P, Hausnerova J, Pijnenborg JMA, Lucas PJF, Reijnen C, Vrede S, Weinberger V. External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK). Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:939226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.939226. eCollection 2022. PMID 35992828
- BACKGROUNDReijnen C, Gogou E, Visser NCM, Engerud H, Ramjith J, van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, van der Wurff AAM, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F; ENITEC Consortium; Massuger LFAG, Snijders MPLM, Kusters-Vandevelde HVN, Lucas PJF, Pijnenborg JMA. Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study. PLoS Med. 2020 May 15;17(5):e1003111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003111. eCollection 2020 May. PMID 32413043
- BACKGROUNDGrube M, Reijnen C, Lucas PJF, Kommoss F, Kommoss FKF, Brucker SY, Walter CB, Oberlechner E, Kramer B, Andress J, Neis F, Staebler A, Pijnenborg JMA, Kommoss S. Improved preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients: external validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian network model in a large population-based case series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04218-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8. PMID 35939115