Clinical trial · Interventional
Improving a Bile Duct Drainage Procedure in Patients With Inoperable Cancer Blocking the Bile Ducts: Comparing Two Types of Endoscopically Placed Internal Stents to Prevent Blockage of a Lumen Apposing Metal Stent
Optimising EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy With Lumen Apposing Metal Stent With Stent in Stent Placement: a Randomised Study Between Double Pigtail Stent and Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent. The Opti-LAMS Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study looks at the best way to treat bile duct blockage in people with advanced cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. A blocked bile duct can cause serious symptoms like yellowing of the skin (jaundice), infection, and pain. A common procedure called ERCP sometimes doesn't work in these patients. A newer method called EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) uses internal ultrasound to place a special metal tube (called a LAMS) to allow bile to drain. However, over time this stent can still become blocked. To reduce this risk, doctors can place a second stent inside the first. This study is comparing two types of these second stents: * A plastic stent (double pigtail stent or DPS) * A metal stent (fully covered self-expanding metal stent or FCSEMS) The study will include patients at Waikato Hospital. After the first stent is placed, they will be randomly assigned to receive either a DPS or FCSEMS. Patients will be followed for 6 months to see how well the stents work. The aim is to find out which approach keeps the bile duct open longer and reduces the need for further procedures or hospitalisation, helping improve care and comfort for people with advanced cancer
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Cholangiocarcinoma | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Lumen Apposing Metal Stents | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Malignant Biliary Obstruction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double pigtail stent (DPS) within LAMS | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Fully covered self expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) within LAMS | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Fully covered self expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) within LAMS
- description
- In those randomised to FCSEMS, size will depend on the size of the LAMS with a 6mm LAMS to be stented with 8mm diameter FCSEMS and an 8mm LAMS to be stented with a 10mm FCSEMS, 4cm or 6cm length. The aim is to have at least 3cm of FCSEMS in the duodenal lumen If unable to place FCSEM through LAMS, crossover to DPS is allowed with plan for both intention to treat and per protocol analysis to be undertaken after completion of the study
- interventionNames
- Device: Fully covered self expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) within LAMS
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Double pigtail stent (DPS) within LAMS
- description
- In those randomised to DPS, a double pigtail will be placed through the LAMS. The size of the stents will be left to the discretion of the proceduralist though 7Fr calibre with 7cm length is the recommended size
- interventionNames
- Device: Double pigtail stent (DPS) within LAMS
Primary outcomes (1)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years. * Radiologically or histologically proven malignant distal bile duct obstruction with unresectable or metastatic disease, including those who have already failed ERCP * Indication for biliary drainage with presence of obstructive jaundice biochemically and dilated biliary system on imaging. * Informed consent provided. * Common bile duct (CBD) size of at least 12mm on EUS imaging Exclusion Criteria: * Previous biliary stenting or surgery precluding EUS-CDS. * Inability to provide informed consent. * Pregnancy. * Significant coagulopathy that is not correctable. * Futility of intervention e.g. pre-terminal patients
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available