Clinical trial · Observational
ADAR1 Expression Level in Rectal Cancer
The Effect of ADAR1 Expression Level on Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is currently the standard treatment for locally/locally advanced rectal cancer due to better response and fewer distant metastases. In TNT, sequential chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are planned and depending on the treatment response, either surgery is performed or a watch and wait approach is applied. Depending on tumor localization and patient performance status, CT is planned as induction or consolidation. Most of the time, mFOLFOX6 and CAPOX are preferred as CT regimen. In proximal rectal cancer, surgery can be performed without CRT and only after CT. In locally/locally advanced rectal cancer, the aim is to avoid surgery as much as possible or to perform sphincter-sparing surgery if possible. Colonoscopy and pelvic MR at the time of diagnosis are the most important steps in staging, treatment selection and decision making. These two diagnostic methods should be repeated especially for watch and wait decision and for response evaluation after TNT. ADAR 1 (Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA1) is an RNA editing enzyme that catalyzes the deamination of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I), a dynamic modification that can lead to a diverse transcriptome in a combinatorial manner. A defect in ADAR1-mediated RNA modification results in abnormal regulation of substrates that can affect phenotypic changes in cancer. This phenomenon of over-regulation is seen in many cancers such as colon, liver, lung, breast and esophageal cancers and in many cases promotes tumor progression. In studies, increased ADAR1 expression has been associated with lower survival and worse prognosis, especially in metastatic colon and gastric cancer. ADAR1 is also predicted to increase proliferation through both the AKT pathway and the mTOR pathway and therefore may be targeted in the near future. ADAR1 expression is monitored by RNA-based real time PCR. In order to demonstrate increased expression, biopsies should be taken from the malignant tissue and the intact tissue of the patient and the biopsy should be stored under -80 C conditions immediately after biopsy to prevent RNA degradation. The tissue will not come into contact with nitrogen or formaldehyde. In this study, sufficient biopsies from cancerous and intact tissue will be taken from patients with suspected rectal cancer, confirmed by pelvic MRI and consent for participation in the study, and fresh tissue will be stored at -80 C in the genetics laboratory. After the TNT plan is made by the investigators and the treatment is completed, both pelvic MRI and control rectoscopy will be performed for preoperative evaluation. Again, biopsies will be taken from diseased and healthy tissue and ADAR1 expression will be evaluated. The study is planned to include 50 participants and a period of one year is foreseen for tissue procurement/storage. The investigators' aim in this study will be to determine whether ADAR1 expression level changes after TNT, whether this predicts clinical and pathological response, whether responses change according to the selected CT, whether there is a difference between CT induction-consolidation/RT short or long course, and the relationship between tumor DNA mismatch repair enzyme status and ADAR1 level. The investigators primary endpoint will be the effect of the change in ADAR1 expression level on the response after TNT (ORR). Secondary endpoints will be quality of life, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectum Cancer, Adenocarcinoma | Rectal Carcinoma | ALIAS | 0.85 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA1 | Genetic | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- 50 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma scheduled for TNT.
- description
- Biopsies will be taken from these 50 patients at the time of diagnosis and after TNT. The relationship between ADAR1 expression levels and TNT response will be investigated.
- interventionNames
- Genetic: Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA1
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1
- timeFrame
- From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
- description
- Evaluation of target lesions Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this may include the baseline sum). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 90 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Histological and staging diagnosis of local/locally advanced rectal cancer * ECOG performance score between 0 and 2 * No contraindications for chemotherapy (CT) and/or radiotherapy (RT) Exclusion Criteria: * Those diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer * Those suspected of having rectal cancer or patients with a diagnosis of a second primary cancer * Those who have not signed the informed consent form * Those with contraindications for chemotherapy (CT) and/or radiation therapy (RT)
References
Publications (8)
- RESULTWang Q, Li X, Qi R, Billiar T. RNA Editing, ADAR1, and the Innate Immune Response. Genes (Basel). 2017 Jan 18;8(1):41. doi: 10.3390/genes8010041. PMID 28106799
- RESULTOkugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Shigeyasu K, Yamamoto A, Shigemori T, Yin C, Ichikawa T, Yasuda H, Fujikawa H, Yoshiyama S, Hiro J, Ohi M, Araki T, Kusunoki M, Goel A. Enhanced AZIN1 RNA editing and overexpression of its regulatory enzyme ADAR1 are important prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer. J Transl Med. 2018 Dec 18;16(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1740-z. PMID 30563560
- RESULTShigeyasu K, Okugawa Y, Toden S, Miyoshi J, Toiyama Y, Nagasaka T, Takahashi N, Kusunoki M, Takayama T, Yamada Y, Fujiwara T, Chen L, Goel A. AZIN1 RNA editing confers cancer stemness and enhances oncogenic potential in colorectal cancer. JCI Insight. 2018 Jun 21;3(12):e99976. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.99976. eCollection 2018 Jun 21. PMID 29925690
- RESULTChan TH, Lin CH, Qi L, Fei J, Li Y, Yong KJ, Liu M, Song Y, Chow RK, Ng VH, Yuan YF, Tenen DG, Guan XY, Chen L. A disrupted RNA editing balance mediated by ADARs (Adenosine DeAminases that act on RNA) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2014 May;63(5):832-43. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304037. Epub 2013 Jun 13. PMID 23766440
- RESULTEisenberg E, Levanon EY. A-to-I RNA editing - immune protector and transcriptome diversifier. Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Aug;19(8):473-490. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0006-1. PMID 29692414
- RESULTChua YJ, Barbachano Y, Cunningham D, Oates JR, Brown G, Wotherspoon A, Tait D, Massey A, Tebbutt NC, Chau I. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Mar;11(3):241-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70381-X. Epub 2010 Jan 25. PMID 20106720
- RESULTGlynne-Jones R, Grainger J, Harrison M, Ostler P, Makris A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to preoperative chemoradiation or radiation in rectal cancer: should we be more cautious? Br J Cancer. 2006 Feb 13;94(3):363-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602960.