Clinical trial · Interventional
Comparison of Efficacy of Topical Adaplene Gel Versus Crythotherapy in Recurrent Plantar Warts
Comparison of Efficacy of Topical Adapalene Gel Versus Cryotherapy in Recurrent Plantar Warts
NCT07016360CI-TRIAL-00109799recruitingPhase 4ClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This is a comparative study between two treatment options for skin viral infection.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viral Warts | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topical Adapalene Gel 0.1% | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Topical Liquid Nitrogen application | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- A
- description
- Treated with Topical adapalene gel 0.1%
- interventionNames
- Drug: Topical Adapalene Gel 0.1%
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- B
- description
- Treated with liquid nitrogen over affected parts
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Topical Liquid Nitrogen application
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Efficacy of Treatment
- timeFrame
- 06 months
- description
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 60 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: \- Patients age limit 18-60 Years Patients with either gender (Male/Female) Patients with recurrent plantar warts Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy/lactation. Pt on topical or systemic therapy in last 6 months. On immunosuppressants. \> 5 lesions. Pts with local secondary infections.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.