Clinical trial · Interventional
Intrathecal Morphine Versus Epidural Analgesia for Open Colon Surgery
Intrathecal Morphine Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Open Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Effective pain management after abdominal surgery is essential for recovery. This study compares two pain relief methods-intrathecal morphine (a single spinal injection) and continuous epidural analgesia-for patients undergoing open colorectal cancer surgery. The investigators expect intrathecal morphine to provide equal pain relief at rest 24 hours after surgery, while epidural analgesia may be more effective during movement. By 48 to 72 hours, both methods should offer similar pain control. The epidural group may require fewer additional pain medications but could experience more side effects, including a higher risk of low blood pressure and technical difficulties. Additionally, these patients may have a slightly longer hospital stay. In contrast, the intrathecal morphine group may have fewer overall side effects. Despite these differences, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and recovery are expected to be similar in both groups. By evaluating these methods, this study aims to determine the most effective and safe approach to post-surgical pain management, improving comfort and recovery outcomes for patients.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analgesia, Postoperative | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Colorectal Carcinoma | Colorectal Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Laparotomy | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidural Analgesia | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Intrathecal Morphine | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Epidural group
- description
- Epidural group will have an epidural catheter inserted in the T10/11 or T11/12 interspace using a midline approach. The epidural space will be identified by a loss of resistance to saline with a Tuohy 18G epidural needle. Subsequently, the epidural catheter will be inserted 4-6 cm into the epidural space and a test-dose of 2% lidocaine, 50 mg, to detect intrathecal misplacement will be given. Epidural group will subsequently receive intraoperative intermittent epidural analgesia followed by postoperative continuous infusion of a levobupivacaine and fentanyl mixture.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Epidural Analgesia
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Spinal group
- description
- In Spinal group, 25 G or 27 G pencil point needle, depending on the preference of the anesthesiologist, will be inserted at L2-L3 or L3-L4 intervertebral space and 300 μg of preservative-free morphine (Morphine Kalceks ®, Kalceks, AS, Riga, Latvija, 10mg/ml) diluted with sterile saline to a volume of 3 mL will be injected intrathecally.
- interventionNames
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery aged 18-80 years, ASA classification I-III, Body Mass Index (BMI) 15-35 kg/m2. Exclusion Criteria: * abnormal coagulation function, defined as prothrombin time or activated partial prothrombin time above standard laboratory values or an international normalised ratio (INR) ≥1.4; or receiving ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation, * thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count \<80×10 9 L-1, * pre-existing skin infection at the neuraxial anesthesia puncture site, * pre-existing neurologic deficit, including peripheral neuropathy, * patients with dementia or other medical condition that includes communication difficulties, * patients with bradycardia (pulse \<50/min) or with conduction block (2nd or 3rd degree) * history of opioid abuse, * allergies to any of the drugs used in the study. Additionally, patients converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy due to technical surgical issues, patients with postoperative surgical complications (need for revision) or if epidural catheter placement/spinal anesthesia is unsuccessful even after an attempt by a senior anesthesiologist will also be excluded.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available