Clinical trial · Interventional
Assessing Perceptions of ML Explanations by Medical Oncologists
Survey of Medical Oncologists to Assess Trustworthiness of Various Approaches to AI Explainability for Prognostic Models
NCT06699615CI-TRIAL-00107342enrolling by invitationN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The objective of this proposal is to conduct a vignette-based survey among practicing oncology clinicians who treat non-small cell lung cancer to assess the trustworthiness of explainable predictions from a neurosymbolic AI vs. State-of-the-art post-hoc explanatory algorithms, using simulated patient data.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oncology | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Once time de-identified Qualtrics survey | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- OTHER
- label
- One time de-identified Qualtrics Survey
- interventionNames
- Other: Once time de-identified Qualtrics survey
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Determine whether neurosymbolic AI explainability methods improve the trustworthiness of explanations from a prognostic model, relative to post-hoc explainers.
- timeFrame
- 3 months
- description
- Oncologist will be invited to complete a vignette-based survey
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria "Medical oncologist" or "Hematologist/Oncologist" designation at Penn Treats lung cancer Exclusion Criteria: Non-medical oncologists No email address or physical address listed Does not treat lung cancer
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.