Clinical trial · Interventional
The Impact of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia on Return of Bowel Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Ileal Conduit
The Impact of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia on Return of Bowel Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Ileal Conduit : a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study aims to compare the effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) on bowel function recovery after Bricker surgery.This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 72 patients with bladder cancer undergoing elective Bricker surgery, who were randomly assigned to either the ITM group (n=36) or the CEA group (n=36). Postoperatively, patients in both groups received either ITM or CEA for pain management, and postoperative bowel function recovery time, pain scores, PONV, itching, and other indicators were recorded.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder Cancer | Malignant Bladder Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| EA group | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
| ITM group | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- ITM group
- description
- Patients in the ITM group underwent intrathecal injection with 0.2 mg morphine after admission to the operating room.
- interventionNames
- Device: ITM group
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- EA group
- description
- Patients in the EA group underwent epidural anesthesia after admission to the operating room. Following successful epidural puncture, 3 ml of 2% lidocaine was administered. Once the block level was confirmed, the epidural analgesia pump was activated, delivering 8 ml/h of 0.1% ropivacaine.
- interventionNames
- Device: EA group
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- bowel function recovery time
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * All participants provided informed consent voluntarily * ASA I-III Exclusion Criteria: * allergies to any anesthetic agents used in this study * refused to sign the consent form * uncooperative were deemed ineligible for clinical evaluation * hypersensitivity to pain * a history of gastrointestinal disease * sleep disorders
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available