Clinical trial · Interventional
Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: a Multicentre, Prospective, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint, PROBE Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn to compare the safety and efficacy of virtual ileostomy versus diverting ileostomy in patients undergoing sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the virtual ileostomy a safe and effective alternative to the ileostomy? * Is it scientifically reasonable to perform diverting ileostomy intraoperatively? Researchers will compare virtual ileostomy to diverting ileostomy to see if the virtual ileostomy works to reduce rates of stoma. Participants will: * Performing diverting ileostomy or virtual ileostomy undergoing sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer * Continuous follow-up of their complications after the first surgery
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal Cancer | Malignant Rectal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual ileostomy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Virtual ileostomy
- description
- A pre-stage ileostomy, anchored under the abdominal wall by a vascular sling or rubber tape through the mesenteric window, is delivered to the outside of the abdomen, where the VI is pulled through the abdominal wall.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Virtual ileostomy
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Diverting ileostomy
- description
- Diverting ileostomy (DI) is a common fecal diversion procedure performed in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) procedure for rectal cancer to protect the anastomosis and reduce the risk of complications.
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Comprehensive Complication index (CCI) at the 6th postoperative month
- timeFrame
- An average of 6 month from the date of low anterior resection for rectal cancer until the date of when the patient's condition is stabilized without complications
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of rectal cancer confirmed by pathology * Age ≥ 18 years * Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical procedures and colon-rectum or colon-anal anastomosis:1.anterior resection (AR/ PME), 2. low anterior resection (LAR) , 3.intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection (ISR), 4.transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) * Signed informed consent * Ability to understand the nature and risks of participating in the trial Exclusion Criteria: * Emergency surgery, open surgery * ASA score \>3points * Patients with combined complete intestinal obstruction * Long-term history of using immunosuppressants or glucocorticoids * Combined severe cardiac disease: with congestive heart failure or NYHA cardiac function ≥ grade 2. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery surgery within 6 months before the procedure * Chronic renal failure (requiring dialysis or glomerular filtration rate \<30 mL/min) * Intraoperative combined multi-organ resection * Combined cirrhosis of the liver * Intraoperative findings of incomplete anastomosis and positive insufflation test * Modified Bacon procedure(Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis) * Due to an intraoperative accident the surgeon felt that a diverting ileostomy was necessary. * Currently participating in other clinical trials
References
Publications (14)
- BACKGROUNDDegiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, De Nardi P, Tomatis M, Biondi A, Persiani R, Solaini L, Rizzo G, Soriero D, Cianflocca D, Milone M, Turri G, Rega D, Delrio P, Pedrazzani C, De Palma GD, Borghi F, Scabini S, Coco C, Cavaliere D, Simone M, Rosati R, Reddavid R; collaborators from the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;24(3):264-276. doi: 10.1111/codi.15997. Epub 2021 Dec 6. PMID 34816571
- BACKGROUNDZhao S, Zhang L, Gao F, Wu M, Zheng J, Bai L, Li F, Liu B, Pan Z, Liu J, Du K, Zhou X, Li C, Zhang A, Pu Z, Li Y, Feng B, Tong W. Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1151-1158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568. PMID 34613330
- BACKGROUNDLightner AL, Vogel JD, Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Shah SA, Mahadevan U, Kane SV, Paquette IM, Steele SR, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Crohn's Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Aug;63(8):1028-1052. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001716. No abstract available. PMID 32692069
- BACKGROUNDPenna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP; TaTME Registry Collaborative. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: International Registry Results of the First 720 Cases. Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):111-117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001948. PMID 27735827
- BACKGROUNDPalumbo P, Usai S, Pansa A, Lucchese S, Caronna R, Bona S. Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Surgery: Role of the Ghost Ileostomy. Anticancer Res. 2019 Jun;39(6):2975-2983. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13429. PMID 31177138