Clinical trial · Observational
The Relationship Between Time Perspective, Fear of Cancer Recurrence, Rumination, and Catastrophizing in Gastric Cancer Survivors
The Formation Pathway of Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Gastric Cancer Survivors From a Time Perspective
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The temporal perspective provides a theory oriented to temporal insights that can shed light on the role of cognitive coping styles in the formation of fear of cancer recurrence. The self-regulatory executive function model elucidates the central role of rumination thinking, catastrophizing cognitive coping styles in the formation of cancer recurrence fear. Therefore, this study will rely on both theoretical models to construct a cognitive appraisal coping model to explore the formation pathway of cancer recurrence fear
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric Cancer Patient | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (4)
- measure
- Time perspective
- timeFrame
- through study completion, an average of 1 year
- description
- The Chinese version of ZIPI scale was adopted for the measurement of time perspective, ZIPI scale is the current international common measurement tool.ZTPI scale was developed by Zimbardo et al. in 1999, which is mainly used for assessing individual\'s time perspective, the scale has been translated by scholars from many countries, and has good cross-cultural applicability. The Chinese version of the ZTPI scale was Chineseized and revised by Wang Chen in 2016, and the revised scale can be divided into five dimensions of past negativity (7 entries), past positivity (6 entries), present impulsivity (4 entries), future (5 entries), and present predestination (3 entries), with a total of 25 entries after exploratory factor analysis.All questions are scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating a greater tendency towards certain time perspective.
- measure
- Catastrophizing
- timeFrame
- through study completion, an average of 1 year
- description
- Catastrophizing was measured using the 4-item Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Catastrophizing subscale ( CERQ-CS ). Chinese scholars such as Zhu Xiongzhao (2007) revised the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) to form the Chinese version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-C) applicable to the Chinese version.Each item of the CERQ - CS has 5 responses ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Higher total scores on this subscale indicate higher levels of catastrophizing, and this subscale has good reliability in the Chinese population, the minimum value is 4 points, and the maximum value is 20 points
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Preoperative gastroscopy and pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer; * Aged 18 years or older * There is no history of recurrent disease or new primary cancer * Received surgical resection of cancerous tissues or radiotherapy treatment * Conscious, with normal communication and comprehension ability * The patients were aware of their own condition and diagnosis, and informedly agreed to participate in this study Exclusion Criteria: ● History of mental or cognitive impairment prior to cancer diagnosis
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available