Clinical trial · Interventional
The Effect of Motivational Interviewing in Women's Health
The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Behaviour of Healthcare Demand Procrastination, Health Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer Screenings, and Screening Participation in Women
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The behaviour of healthcare demand procrastination constitutes an obstacle for individuals to lead a healthy life, and an example of this is the low participation rate of women in pap-smear screening programs compared to the target population. It is known that motivational interviews are frequently used and effective in studies planned to change health behavior. According to the results of the power analysis, at least 104 women, 52 experimental and 52 control, should be included in the study. Data will be collected with the "Personal Information Form", "Healthcare Demand Procrastination Scale", "Health Belief Model Scale for Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test" and "Evaluation Form for Cervical Cancer Screening Participation". Motivational interviews will be given to the women in the experimental group.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | Malignant Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Health Behavior | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Procrastination | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental (Motivational Interviews) | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Experimental group
- description
- Motivational Interviews
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: Experimental (Motivational Interviews)
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Control group
- description
- Control
Primary outcomes (3)
- measure
- Healthcare Demand Procrastination Scale
- timeFrame
- At the end of the 4 weeks
- description
- The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale is "11", the maximum score is "55", and as the score obtained from the scale increases, behaviour of healthcare demand procrastination also increase.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 30 Years
- Maximum age
- 65 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * The ages of 30-65, * Having not had cervical cancer screening before, * Having not had a hysterectomy operation, * Being literate, * Volunteering to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Those who have communication problems, * Those with psychiatric and mental illnesses, * Those who have previously attended any training on cervical cancer screening, * Pregnant women
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available