Clinical trial · Interventional
Eerder Erbij: The Path Towards Offering Timely Support for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers
Eerder Erbij: Een Vroege Ondersteuning Voor Mensen Met Dementie en Hun Mantelzorgers. The Path Towards Offering Timely Support for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE It has been estimated that at least 50% of the home living persons with dementia in the Netherlands receive little or no formal care and support (Zorgstandaard Dementie, 2013). Reasons why persons with dementia and their informal caregivers receive no formal care vary, include absence of diagnosis, denial of illness, embarrassment or the complexity of the care and referral system. A common concern among health care professionals is that by the time the person with dementia or informal caregiver do seek or receive formal care it may be too late. The difficulties at home may already be so severe that there is little that community-based care can do and admission to residential care may follow soon after. Appropriate support at an earlier stage may prevent more serious difficulties and postpone admission to residential care. Therefore, health care professionals are looking for strategies to reach persons with dementia and caregivers in an earlier stage of dementia and encourage them to accept some form of help or support. The rationale of this study is to investigate how persons living with dementia and their close others can be encouraged to accept support and whether support at an early stage is effective in preventing severe deterioration in wellbeing, behavioural difficulties and high care costs later on. OBJECTIVES * Estimate the effect of EE on caregiver self-efficacy compared to usual care * Estimate the effect of EE on the total care costs of caregiver and person with dementia compared to usual care * Estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of EE compared to usual care * Perform a process evaluation to monitor delivery of EE and experiences of persons with dementia, caregivers and care professionals * Explore treatment responsiveness of EE in terms of self-efficacy and quality of life STUDY DESIGN Pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. STUDY POPULATION Informal caregivers and people with early-stage dementia, who are community dwelling and receive little or no dementia-related formal ADL care. INTERVENTION The intervention (Eerder Erbij, EE) is a person-centred, manual-based intervention consisting of education, information and a support group. MAIN STUDY PARAMETERS/ENDPOINTS Primary: self-efficacy. Cost-utility: EQ5D, RUD. Secondary: quality-of-life, caregiver burden. DATA COLLECTION Measurements consist of questionnaires (total duration is approximately 1 hour; administered at home; take place at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months).
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dementia, Mild | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eerder Erbij | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Eerder Erbij (intervention group)
- description
- Informal caregivers and people with dementia assigned to the intervention group will receive the 6-week intervention "Eerder Erbij".
- interventionNames
- Other: Eerder Erbij
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Usual/standard care (control group)
- description
- Participants in the comparison condition will continue to receive usual care. Care for people with dementia in the Netherlands varies across municipalities, but the majority lives at home and especially earlier stages of the disease, most people living with dementia and their informal caregivers use no or very little formal care, apart from occasional visitors to GP or by case manager. The control group will be shared with another collaborating study from 'Maastricht University', which has the same goals, applies the same inclusion criteria, applies the same study procedures, and obtains the same outcomes. This implies that the data of the participants recruited for the control group for this study will be shared with the collaborating study.
Primary outcomes (1)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Informal caregivers can be spouses, relatives, or friends who care for and support the person with dementia without pay. If the caregiver does not live with the person with dementia, they have to visit the person with dementia at least 3 times a week to be eligible for the study. * The person with dementia must be living at home cared for by the caregiver. * The person with dementia should have a diagnosis of dementia or experience severe cognitive impairments suggesting dementia. Type of dementia is not an inclusion criterion. * The person with dementia is not yet receiving formal care related to personal activities of daily living on account of his or her dementia more than once a week (defined by receiving assistance from a paid worker by e.g., health or social care professional as help with dressing/undressing; washing/bathing/showering; toileting; feeding/drinking; or taking medication). Exclusion Criteria: * Main exclusion criteria for both the caregiver and the person with dementia will be major mental or physical illness, such as major depression or stroke, that would affect their ability to participate in this study. * Person with dementia or informal caregiver is participating in another intervention or similar support program. * Dementia is caused by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), acquired brain impairment, Down syndrome, chorea associated with Huntington's disease, or alcohol abuse. * Inability to give informed consent will also be an exclusion criterion. * Informal caregiver is younger than 18 years old.
References
Publications (7)
- BACKGROUNDOsstyn SL, Handels R, Boots LMM, Balvert SCE, Evers SMAA, de Vugt ME. The effectiveness and health-economic evaluation of "Partner in Balance," a blended self-management program for early-stage dementia caregivers: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Jun 22;24(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07423-9. PMID 37349828
- BACKGROUNDBjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3. PMID 11832252
- BACKGROUNDFortinsky RH, Kercher K, Burant CJ. Measurement and correlates of family caregiver self-efficacy for managing dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2002 May;6(2):153-60. doi: 10.1080/13607860220126763. PMID 12028884
- BACKGROUNDLogsdon RG, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Teri L. Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):510-9. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016. PMID 12021425
- BACKGROUNDMakai P, Looman W, Adang E, Melis R, Stolk E, Fabbricotti I. Cost-effectiveness of integrated care in frail elderly using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D: does choice of instrument matter? Eur J Health Econ. 2015 May;16(4):437-50. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0583-7. Epub 2014 Apr 24. PMID 24760405
- BACKGROUNDWimo A, Gustavsson A, Jonsson L, Winblad B, Hsu MA, Gannon B. Application of Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument in a global setting. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jul;9(4):429-435.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Nov 9. PMID 23142433
- BACKGROUNDPot AM, van Dyck R, Deeg DJ. [Perceived stress caused by informal caregiving. Construction of a scale]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1995 Oct;26(5):214-9. Dutch.