Clinical trial · Interventional
Personalized Rendering of Motor System Functional Plasticity Potential to Improve Glioma Resection and Quality of Life
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Background Lower-grade-gliomas affect young patients, thus the longest progression-free-survival (PFS) with a high level quality of life is crucial. Surgery most significantly impacts on tumor natural history, postponing recurrence, improving symptoms, decreasing the need of adjuvant therapies, with extent of resection, gross-total and supra-total (GTR and STR), strongly associating with longest PFS. Achievement of GTR or STR depends on the degree of functional reorganization induced by glioma. Consequently, a successful treatment fostering neural circuit reorganization before surgery, would increase the chance of GRT/STR. Hypothesis The plastic potential of motor system suggests that reorganization of circuits controlling hand movements could be presurgically fostered in LGG patients by enhancing plasticity with up-front motor-rehabilitation and/or by decreasing tumor infiltration with up-front chemotherapy. Advanced neuroimaging allows to infer the neuroplasticity potential. Intraoperative assessment of the motor circuits functionality will validate reliability of preoperative analyses. Aims The project has 4 aims, investigating: A) the presurgical functional (FC) and structural (SC) connectomics of the hand-motor network to picture the spontaneous reorganization and the influence of clinical, imaging and histomolecular variables; B) the dynamic of FC and SC after tumor resection; C) changes in FC and SC maps after personalized upfront motor rehabilitation and/or chemotherapy; D) the effect of FC and SC upfront treatment on the achievement of GTR/STR preserving hand dexterity. Experimental Design Resting-state fMRI and diffusion-MRI will provide FC and SC maps pre- and post-surgery; personalized up-front motor rehabilitation and/or chemotherapy will be administered; Intraoperative brain mapping procedures will generate data to validate the maps. Expected Results 1. Provide a tool to render the motor functional reorganization predictive of surgical outcome. 2. Identify demographic, clinical and imaging variables associated with functional reorganization. 3. Describe the gain induced by up-front treatment. 4. Distinguish "patterns" predicting chance for GTR/STR from "patterns" suggesting need for up-front treatment. Impact On Cancer Results will increase the achievement of GTR/STR, preserving motor integrity, with dramatic impact on LGGs natural history.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glioma | Glioma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Glioma, Malignant | Malignant Glioma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (3)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Up-front Chemotherapy | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Up-front Motor Rehabilitation | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (4)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Spontaneous motor reorganization: observation
- description
- Only neurological and neuropsychological assessment as per normal clinical routine and conventional and advanced functional, resting-state MRI acquisitions
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: Resting State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Enhanced motor reorganization: upfront Motor Rehabilitation
- description
- Patients submitted to motor rehabilitation program aimed at learning unimanual and bimanual coordinated sequences, along with personalized exercise according to tumor location (frontal vs parietal). For 6 months each patient will perform the motor training program in outpatient training session, checked by a physiotherapist for corrected execution at home 3 times/week, and is assessed for the correct training execution and progresses in training sessions each month, by physical therapists at the Rehabilitation Unit and on a weekly schedule by on-line distant monitoring (telemedicine).
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: Up-front Motor Rehabilitation
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria (ARM 1): * Patients signing informed consent for participation in the study * Males and females * Age ≥ 18 years * Patients with lower-grade gliomas with involvement of the motor pathways who are candidates for surgery Inclusion Criteria (ARM 2/3/4): * Patients signing informed consent for participation in the study * Males and females * Age ≥ 18 years * Patients with lower-grade gliomas treated over two years with tumors only biopsied and/or partially resected and eligible for second surgery Exclusion Criteria: * Age \<18 years * Inability to adhere to standard study controls * Subjects unable to understand and freely provide consent to the study
References
Publications (27)
- BACKGROUNDBello L, Riva M, Fava E, Ferpozzi V, Castellano A, Raneri F, Pessina F, Bizzi A, Falini A, Cerri G. Tailoring neurophysiological strategies with clinical context enhances resection and safety and expands indications in gliomas involving motor pathways. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Aug;16(8):1110-28. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not327. Epub 2014 Feb 4. PMID 24500420
- BACKGROUNDCastellano A, Donativi M, Ruda R, De Nunzio G, Riva M, Iadanza A, Bertero L, Rucco M, Bello L, Soffietti R, Falini A. Evaluation of low-grade glioma structural changes after chemotherapy using DTI-based histogram analysis and functional diffusion maps. Eur Radiol. 2016 May;26(5):1263-73. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3934-6. Epub 2015 Aug 30. PMID 26318368
- BACKGROUNDCochereau J, Deverdun J, Herbet G, Charroud C, Boyer A, Moritz-Gasser S, Le Bars E, Molino F, Bonafe A, Menjot de Champfleur N, Duffau H. Comparison between resting state fMRI networks and responsive cortical stimulations in glioma patients. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3721-3732. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23270. PMID 27246771
- BACKGROUNDFornia L, Ferpozzi V, Montagna M, Rossi M, Riva M, Pessina F, Martinelli Boneschi F, Borroni P, Lemon RN, Bello L, Cerri G. Functional Characterization of the Left Ventrolateral Premotor Cortex in Humans: A Direct Electrophysiological Approach. Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jan 1;28(1):167-183. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw365. PMID 27920095
- BACKGROUNDFornia L, Rossi M, Rabuffetti M, Leonetti A, Puglisi G, Vigano L, Simone L, Howells H, Bellacicca A, Bello L, Cerri G. Direct Electrical Stimulation of Premotor Areas: Different Effects on Hand Muscle Activity during Object Manipulation. Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jan 10;30(1):391-405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz139. PMID 31504261
- BACKGROUNDFornia L, Rossi M, Rabuffetti M, Bellacicca A, Vigano L, Simone L, Howells H, Puglisi G, Leonetti A, Callipo V, Bello L, Cerri G. Motor impairment evoked by direct electrical stimulation of human parietal cortex during object manipulation. Neuroimage. 2022 Mar;248:118839. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118839. Epub 2021 Dec 25.