Clinical trial · Observational
Surgical Skill Labs for Robotic Mastectomy and Educational Program Using a Surgical Guide by Artificial Intelligence
Surgical Skill Labs for Robotic Mastectomy Using Cadaver And Porcine Models and Educational Program Using a Surgical Guide by Artificial Intelligence
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The goal of this prospective study is to investigate the satisfaction, NASA-Task Load Index (TLX), and surgical proficiency of a robotic breast surgery education program using cadaver or porcine models, as well as to develop an AI-based surgical guide for utilization within the educational program in trainees for robotic breast surgery. The main question\[s\]it aims to evaluate : * Satisfaction questionnaire of a educational program * NASA-TLX of a educational program * global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (GEARS) of a robotic breast surgery for surgical proficiency Participants will participate the educational program and fill out a satisfaction questionnaire and NASA-TLX. The tutor evaluates GEARS for 15 minutes at the beginning and end of training. After the development of the surgical guide based on AI, researchers will compare a training group with or without surgical guide to see the effect of the surgical guide.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Neoplasms | Breast Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Educational Problems | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Surgical Procedure, Unspecified | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| A educational program | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (3)
- measure
- Satisfaction questionnaire of a educational program
- timeFrame
- 1 day
- description
- (grading scale: 1-insufficient/inadequate; 2-reasonable/adequate; 3-sufficient; 4-good; 5-very good.) Participants' perceived goals for attending the course: 1. Met expectations in knowledge (theory), 2. met expectations in skill practice, 3. met knowledge requirements in theory, 4. met the essentials in skills development, 5. developed participants at skills performance. Teaching/learning environment: 6. ambience of the laboratory, 7. structure of the session, 8. pace of the session, 9. mix explanation/opportunity to practise, 10. environment \& content valuable for understanding, 11. participants' involvement, 12. development of participants' interest in the skills, 13. training adequacy. Teaching staff performance: 14. Relationship with participants, 15. enthusiasm for teaching, 16. encouragement of participants' participation, 17. clear explanations, 18. clear demonstration of each component of the skill, 19. 'feedback'
- measure
- NASA-Task Load index of a educational program
- timeFrame
- 1 day
- description
- Hart and Staveland's NASA Task Load Index method assesses work load on five 7-point scales. Increments of high, medium and low estimates for each point result in 21 gradations on the scales. (grading scale: 1- very low; 21-very high.) 1. Mental Demand: How mentally demanding was the task? 2. Physical Demand: How physically demanding was the task? 3. Temporal Demand: How hurried or rushed was the pace of the task? 4. Performance: How successful were participants in accomplishing what participants were asked to do? 5. Effort: How hard did participants have to work to accomplish participants' level of performance? 6. Frustration: How insecure, discouraged, irritated, stressed, and annoyed were participants?
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * A breast surgeon who completed the basic dry lab for surgical robot platform before the educational program * A trainee who signed a informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * A trainee who did not sign a informed consent * A trainees judged by the researcher to be inappropriate for participation in this study
References
Publications (3)
- BACKGROUNDda Costa PM, Santos J, Maio R, Santos A, Paredes F. The role of a basic surgical skills laboratory as viewed by medical students (6th year). Med Teach. 2001 Mar;23(2):176-180. doi: 10.1080/01421590120036565. PMID 11371295
- BACKGROUNDGoh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.032. Epub 2011 Nov 17. PMID 22099993
- BACKGROUNDWilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4. PMID 21597890