Clinical trial · Interventional
EPIBONE Study: a Prospective Study on Feasibility, Safety and Accuracy
Evaluation of the EPIONE Robotic System for Image-guided Percutaneous Bone Procedures A Prospective Study on Feasibility, Safety and Accuracy
NCT06376682CI-TRIAL-00095547EPIBONEcompletedN/AResults postedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Interventional clinical study to obtain performance and safety data of the EPIONE® device when used for bone percutaneous procedures.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone Metastases | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Bone Tumor | Bone Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Fractures, Bone | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT-guided bone percutaneous procedure | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Interventional arm
- description
- Patients treated by percutaneous CT-guided procedures in the bone with the EPIONE® device
- interventionNames
- Procedure: CT-guided bone percutaneous procedure
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Successful Introducer Insertion With the EPIONE Device.
- timeFrame
- Day of the procedure
- description
- To evaluate the feasibility of the EPIONE robotic assistance for bone percutaneous procedures based on a definition of conversion to manual technique
Secondary outcomes (3)
- measure
- Adverse Event(s) (AE)
- timeFrame
- Up to 1 month
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient ≥18 years, 2. Patient with indication of CT-guided percutaneous bone procedure under general anaesthesia validated at a multidisciplinary consultation meeting, 3. Patient who has signed an informed consent form, 4. Patient covered by a social security system, Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with contraindication to general anaesthesia, 2. Patient undergoing a procedure without appropriate breathing control, 3. Patient scheduled for CT-guided percutaneous procedures on head and neck, including skull and cervical vertebrae, 4. Patient with medical, psychosocial or emotional conditions unable to fully understand the study protocol, give an uninfluenced informed consent, or meet the study requirements during its whole duration. 5. Pregnant or breast-feeding women, 6. Patient under legal protection (tutorship, guardianship, …), 7. Patient already participating in another interventional clinical study.
References
Publications (1)
- DERIVEDBonnet B, Stacoffe N, Dassa M, Tselikas L, Beunon P, Tutton S, Pialat JB, Milot L, Thiery L, Mastier C, Daidj N, Boulade W, de Baere T, Deschamps F, Piana G. Robotic-Assisted Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Bone Procedures: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2026 Jul 29. doi: 10.1007/s00270-026-04545-w. Online ahead of print. PMID 42527616