Clinical trial · Interventional
Intraarterial Carboplatin + Caelyx vs Intraarterial Carboplatin + Etoposide Phosphate for Progressing Glioblastoma
A Randomized Phase II Study on Intraarterial Carboplatin Combined With Caelyx Compared to Intraarterial Carboplatin Combined With Etoposide Phosphate for Progressing Glioblastoma at First or Second Relapse
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment involves maximal resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide. Progression-free survival (PFS) with this treatment is only 6.9 months and relapse is inevitable. At relapse, there is no consensus regarding the optimal therapeutic strategy. The rationale behind the fact that limited chemotherapy agents are available in the treatment of malignant gliomas is related to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which impedes drug entry to the brain. Intraarterial (IA) chemotherapy allows to circumvent this. Using IA delivery of carboplatin, can produce responses in 70% of patients for a median PFS of 5 months. Median survival from study entry was 11 months, whereas the overall survival (OS) 23 months. How can the OS and PFS be improved? By combining chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action. Study design: In this phase II trial, treatment will be offered at relapse. Surgery will be performed for cytoreduction if it is warranted, followed with a combination IA carboplatin + IA Cealyx (liposomal doxorubicin) or IA carboplatin + IA etoposide phosphate. Toxicity will be assessed according to the NCIC common toxicity criteria. Treatment will consist in either IA carboplatin (400 mg/m\^2) + IA Cealyx (30 mg/m\^2) or IA carboplatin (400 mg/m\^2) + IA etoposide phosphate (400 mg/m\^2) every 4-6 weeks (1 cycle). Up to twelve cycles will be offered. Outcome measurements: Tumor response will be evaluated using the RANO criteria by magnetic resonance imaging monthly. Primary outcome will PFS and tumor response. Secondary outcome will include median OS, toxicity, quality of life (QOL), neurocognition (NC). Putting together these data will allow to correlate clinical and radiological response to QOL and NC.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glioblastoma Multiforme | Glioblastoma | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Relapse | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| IA Carboplatin + IA Caelyx | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| IA Carboplatin + IA Etoposide Phosphate | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- IA Carboplatin + IA Caelyx
- description
- Participants will be treated with IA carboplatin + IA liposomal doxorubicin on each cycle (4-6 weeks), for up to 12 cycles.
- interventionNames
- Drug: IA Carboplatin + IA Caelyx
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- IA Carboplatin + IA Etoposide Phosphate
- description
- Participants will be treated with IA carboplatin + IA etoposide phosphate on each cycle (4-6 weeks), for up to 12 cycles.
- interventionNames
- Drug: IA Carboplatin + IA Etoposide Phosphate
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Tumor Response on MRI using the RANO Criteria
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Histological diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme.
2. Radiological progression on an MRI scan, according to the RANO criteria, in the context of a known glioblastoma multiforme, already treated with the Stupp protocol of combined radiotherapy-Temozolomide. This implies a measurable disease on MRI.
3. Prior radiotherapy and temozolomide, as per the Stupp protocol, no sooner than 4 weeks, is permitted.
4. Eighteen or more years of age.
5. Performance status: Karnofsky ranging from 60 to 100%.
6. Haematopoietic parameters at recruitment:
* Platelet counts \> 100,000/mm3.
* Hemoglobin \> 8 g/dL.
* Absolute neutrophil count \> 1,500/mm3.
7. No impaired bone marrow function.
8. Hepatic parameters at recruitment:
* Bilirubin ≤ 2 times normal value.
* AST and ALT ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2 times ULN (unless attributed to the tumour).
* No impaired hepatic function.
9. Renal parameters at recruitment:
* No impaired renal function.
* Creatinine no greater than 1.5 fold of the normal value.
* Creatinine clearance \> 30 ml/min.
10. Normal ECG.
11. Written informed consent obtained.
* Patients should be either sterile or else use a contraceptive strategy (for at least 2 months prior to study accruals).
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Presence of a severe psychiatric or medical condition that would interfere with treatment administration or study recruitment.
2. Presence of an active autoimmune disease.
3. No prior cardiac disease within the past 5 years OR LVEF of at least 50% at baseline ultrasound.
4. Occurrence of another malignancy within the past 5 years except curatively treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical carcinoma.
5. Pregnancy (as confirmed by a positive b-HCG) or actively nursing.
6. Presence of an uncontrolled systemic infection.References
Publications (19)
- BACKGROUNDStupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330. PMID 15758009
- BACKGROUNDKroll RA, Neuwelt EA. Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means. Neurosurgery. 1998 May;42(5):1083-99; discussion 1099-100. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199805000-00082. PMID 9588554
- BACKGROUNDBradbury MW. The developing experimental approach to the idea of a blood-brain barrier. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;481:137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb27146.x. No abstract available. PMID 3468853
- BACKGROUNDFortin D, Salame JA, Desjardins A, Benko A. Technical modification in the intracarotid chemotherapy and osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption procedure to prevent the relapse of carboplatin-induced orbital pseudotumor. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 May;25(5):830-4. PMID 15140730
- BACKGROUNDNewton HB, Slivka MA, Volpi C, Bourekas EC, Christoforidis GA, Baujan MA, Slone W, Chakeres DW. Intra-arterial carboplatin and intravenous etoposide for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2003 Jan;61(1):35-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1021218207015. PMID 12587794
- BACKGROUNDNewton HB, Figg GM, Slone HW, Bourekas E. Incidence of infusion plan alterations after angiography in patients undergoing intra-arterial chemotherapy for brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 2006 Jun;78(2):157-60. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-9080-2. Epub 2006 Apr 14. PMID 16614945