Temporary Artery Clipping for Robotically-assisted Myomectomy, a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of temporary clipping of the uterine artery and utero-ovarian ligament during robotically assisted myomectomy (RAM) for uterine fibroids. While RAM is increasingly used for myomectomy, bleeding control remains challenging. Temporary clipping of arteries has shown promise in conventional laparoscopy but has not been studied in RAM. This randomized controlled trial will assess primary endpoints such as estimated blood loss, need for transfusion, and hemoglobin drop, alongside secondary outcomes like complication rates and operation time.

Sex

Female

Minimum age

18 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants eligible for inclusion in this Trial must meet all of the following criteria:

1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
2. Use of highly effective methods of birth control; defined as those that, alone or in combination, result in low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly; such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, true sexual abstinence (i.e. refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the Trial treatment(s)) or commitment to a vasectomised partner.
3. Female
4. Age: 18-50 years
5. Myomas, eligible for myomectomy, with the exclusion of FIGO 7-8 myomas.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants eligible for this Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:

1. Any disorder, which in the Investigator's opinion might jeopardise the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol
2. Any prior or concomitant treatment(s) that might jeopardise the participant's safety or that would compromise the integrity of the Trial
3. Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
4. Patient refusal to participate in the Trial
5. (Possible) malignancy
6. any contra indication for a laparoscopic or robotic surgery

• BACKGROUNDWilliams VS, Jones G, Mauskopf J, Spalding J, DuChane J. Uterine fibroids: a review of health-related quality of life assessment. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):818-29. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.818. PMID 16999637
• BACKGROUNDPritts, E. A., & Olive, D. L. (2012). When Should Uterine Fibroids Be Treated? Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-012-0010-y
• BACKGROUNDStewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1501-1512. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640. Epub 2017 May 13. PMID 28296146
• BACKGROUNDAendekerk, S., Verguts, J., Housmans, S., & Timmerman, D. (2019). Implementing robotic assisted myomectomy in surgical practice - a retrospective cohort study. Gynecological Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-019-1059-7
• BACKGROUNDHerrinton LJ, Raine-Bennett T, Liu L, Alexeeff SE, Ramos W, Suh-Burgmann B. Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity. Perm J. 2020;24:19.035. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.035. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PMID 31905335
• BACKGROUNDWinter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC Jr, Bustillo G. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30. PMID 26530837
• BACKGROUNDKongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 15;2014(8):CD005355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005355.pub5. PMID 25125317
• BACKGROUNDJi L, Jin L, Hu M. Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Myomas: Blood Loss and Recurrence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Mar-Apr;25(3):434-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Sep 21.