Clinical trial · Interventional
Volumetric Changes in Large Cystic Lesions Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis vs Passive Decompression
In Patients With Large Cystic Lesion Does Volume Reduction Occurs Faster by Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis Than Using Passive Decompression
NCT06262802CI-TRIAL-00074083unknownN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Null hypothesis active decompression and distraction sugosteogenesis is not faster than passive decompression in volume reduction of large cystic lesions
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Odontogenic Cysts | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active decompression | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Intervention
- interventionNames
- Device: Active decompression
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Control
- interventionNames
- Device: Active decompression
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Volume change
- timeFrame
- 2weeks/one and 6 months
- description
- Percentage of volume changes over time
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 12 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * any patient with large cystic lesion Exclusion Criteria: * any patient can't follow home instructions
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.