Clinical trial · Interventional
Extraperitoneal SINgle-port rObotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Versus Transperitoneal Multi-port RARP in the Treatment Of Prostate Cancer (SINO-TOP)
NCT06238713CI-TRIAL-00119040recruitingN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study is a two-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial on whether single-port extraperitoneal VIP RARP is non-inferior to multi-port transperitoneal RARP in terms of functional recovery rate and other key metrics.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Localized Prostate Carcinoma | Prostate Carcinoma | CURATED_BROADER | 0.78 |
| Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Prostate Adenocarcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing techniques | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy(VIP) techniques | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Single-port extraperitoneal RARP
- description
- Single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy (VIP) techniques
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy(VIP) techniques
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Multi-port transperitoneal RARP
- description
- Multi-port transperitoneal RARP with bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing techniques
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Multi-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing techniques
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Men aged 18 years ≤ age ≤ 75 years; 2. Prostate biopsy within 6 months with diagnosis of organ-localized prostate cancer with preoperative staging of T1c to T2b,N0M0;. 3. Gleason Score\<8. 4. PSA\<20ng/ml. 5. Pathologic diagnosis of prostate follicular adenocarcinoma or prostate ductal adenocarcinoma; 6. The patient has healthy sexual function before surgery and intention for sexual activities after surgery; 7. Physiological condition acceptable for laparoscopic surgery; 8. Willing to cooperate and complete the study follow-up and related examinations; 9. The subject or his agent voluntarily participates in this trial and signs the written informed consent; 10. The questionnaire can be completed in Chinese. 11. The patient has been informed of the trial; Exclusion Criteria: 1. High-risk and non-organ localized prostate cancer (clinical stage ≥ T2c, GS ≥ 8, PSA \> 20ng/ml); 2. Special type of prostate cancer, such as neuroendocrine etc.; 3. History of previous abdominal surgery and radiotherapy which may affect abdominal incision and Port placement; 4. Recent surgery of rectum, perianal abscess or around fistula and perineal area; 5. Patients who have undergone previous electro-prostatectomy/enucleation of the prostate; 6. Non-recurrent patients with less than 12 months of follow-up; 7. ECOG\>1. 8. Combination of other systemic tumors; 9. had received any type of preoperative antitumor therapy; 10. Suffering from poor general condition with the presence of one of the following conditions: including severe mental disorders, cardiovascular disease, active infections, bone marrow transplantation within 3 months, or significant abnormalities in organ function; 11. Participation in other clinical studies or previous treatment with any gene therapy product within the last 3 months; 12. Other conditions that the researchers believe may affect the experimental results or are unethical;
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.