Clinical trial · Interventional
Impact of Training Patient-centered Approach on Shared Decision in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Impact of Training in the Patient-centered Approach on Shared Decision-making in the Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Cluster Randomized Trial
NCT06074536CI-TRIAL-00103069FACELErecruitingN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of face-to-face training of general practitioners on the implementation of a shared decision (in the context of colorectal cancer screening), versus current practice (i.e. without training in the patient-centered approach).
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal Cancer Screening | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| patient-centered approach training | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Interventional arm
- description
- The recruited GPs will be randomized into 2 parallel groups (interventional and control). Following this randomization, the GPs from the interventional group will undergo face-to-face training to the patient-centered approach.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: patient-centered approach training
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Control arm
- description
- The GPs of the control group will take care the patient according to current screening recommendations and procedures organized by the colorectal cancer (CCR) mass screening.
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- The Measurement of the achievement oh the shared decision shared decision making in CRC screening using the patient shared a self-decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q9), validated in French
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 50 Years
- Maximum age
- 74 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patient aged 50 to 74:
* Eligible for organized CRC screening,
* Having declared as attending clinician a general practitioner investigator of the study
✓ Consulting their attending clinician for the duration of the study,
* AND able and willing to comply with all trial requirements
Non inclusion Criteria:
\- ✓ Screened for CRC less than 2 years ago
* Not eligible for organized CRC screening:
* History of adenomas or CRC:
\- Family (1st degree)
* Personal history of IBD:
* Crohn's disease
* Ulcerative colitis)
* Hereditary predispositions:
* Familial adenomatous polyposis
* Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome)
* Patient with symptoms requiring colonoscopy
* Having a level of literacy that does not allow the completion of the self-questionnaire.
* Having an inability to give express consent.
* Being under guardianship, curatorship or having cognitive disordersReferences
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.