Clinical trial · Observational
Anthropological, Socio-cultural and Psychological Surgeons' Factors in Oncology and Brakes for Evaluation of Innovations
Evaluation of Anthropological, Socio-cultural and Psychological Factors of Surgeons Practising in Oncology Which Condition Brakes in the Evaluation of Surgical Innovations
NCT05865964CI-TRIAL-00090290SURGprofilcompletedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 12, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260912-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The field of surgery continues to benefit from innovative solutions, changing surgical methods and techniques. Evaluation in terms of efficacy and Quality-Safety is an essential topic that directly affects the introduction of innovations. It is essential to carry out a robust evaluation strategy for surgical innovations, even if these are often opposed to drug innovations. The aim of this study is to investigate the anthropological, socio-cultural and psychological differences of surgeons that influence the evaluation of surgical innovations.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
No intervention recorded.
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Identification of the parameters associated with barriers to the evaluation of surgical innovations.
- timeFrame
- 21 months
- description
- Logistic regression modelling will be carried out to identify the parameters associated with barriers to the evaluation of surgical innovations. The odds ratios will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals. In accordance with the recommendations of the literature, a top-down stepwise procedure will be performed for the selection of variables.
Secondary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Identification of the parameters associated with involvement in clinical research.
- timeFrame
- 21 months
- description
- Logistic regression modelling will be carried out to identify the parameters associated with involvement in clinical research. The odds ratios will be estimated with their 95% confidence intervals. In accordance with the recommendations of the literature, a top-down stepwise procedure will be performed for the selection of variables.
- measure
- Identification of the parameters associated with knowledge of complementary patterns.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Surgeon practising oncology in France. * E-mail address accessible via one of the companies/cooperating groups that have agreed to participate in the project Exclusion Criteria: * None
References
Publications (33)
- BACKGROUNDBories P, Lamy S, Simand C, Bertoli S, Delpierre C, Malak S, Fornecker L, Moreau S, Recher C, Nebout A. Physician uncertainty aversion impacts medical decision making for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of a national survey. Haematologica. 2018 Dec;103(12):2040-2048. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.192468. Epub 2018 Jul 13. PMID 30006448
- BACKGROUNDBrandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Jan;105(1):66-74; discussion 75-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200001000-00011. PMID 10626972
- BACKGROUNDCastel P, Negrier S, Boissel JP; Plateforme d'Aide a la Recherche Clinique en Cancerologie de la region Rhone-Alpes. Why don't cancer patients enter clinical trials? A review. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Aug;42(12):1744-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.10.033. Epub 2006 Jun 14. PMID 16777404
- BACKGROUNDConcato J, Peduzzi P, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1495-501. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2. PMID 8543963
- BACKGROUNDCook JA. The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2009 Feb 6;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-9. PMID 19200379
- BACKGROUNDCrocker JC, Farrar N, Cook JA, Treweek S, Woolfall K, Chant A, Bostock J, Locock L, Rees S, Olszowski S, Bulbulia R. Recruitment and retention of participants in UK surgical trials: survey of key issues reported by trial staff. BJS Open. 2020 Oct 4;4(6):1238-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50345. Online ahead of print. PMID 33016008
- Cros F, Lamy S, Grosclaude P, Nebout A, Chabrillac E, Vergez S, Bories P, Dupret-Bories A. Physician practice variation in head and neck cancer therapy: Results of a national survey. Oral Oncol. 2021 Jun;117:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105293. Epub 2021 Apr 14.