The Use of a Morcellator in Operative Hysteroscopy for Benign Intracavitary Lesions: a Feasibility Study

Polyps, intracavitary myomas and retained products of conception (RPOC) are common benign intracavitary lesions of the uterus and frequently cause abnormal uterine bleeding or pain. In general, intracavitary lesions are treated by operative hysteroscopy with bipolar resectoscopic removal under general anaesthesia, performed in the theatre (OR). Potential problems with this approach are thermal damage and impairment of visibility due to loose tissue fragments necessitating multiple entries for tissue removal. Recently, lesion morcellation by hysteroscopy has been introduced as an alternative technique. Compared to the resectoscopic approach, morcellation is reportedly associated with a shorter total procedure time, smaller fluid deficit and number of insertions. A few trials also registered a higher success rate in completeness of resection. No significant differences in odds of surgical complications have been reported. Most hysteroscopic morcellators have diameters up to 8 mm, for which cervical dilation under general anaesthesia is usually needed. Recently, companies have developed hysteroscopic morcellators with smaller diameters, e.g. 6.3 mm for the 19 Fr. intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). This means less need for cervical dilation, and potential use without anesthesia. At this moment, there are no prospective studies available on feasibility of the 19 Fr. intrauterine BIGATTI Shaver (IBS®). Before implementing hysteroscopic morcellation in our department, we need a feasibility study assessing the method in standard conditions in the operation room or in ambulatory setting under sedation. Trial objectives: Assessment of the feasibility of hysteroscopic morcellation of benign uterine intracavitary lesions. The primary objective is to assess the completeness of hysteroscopic resection in patients undergoing the procedure under general anesthesia or sedation. Secondary objectives are to assess perioperative parameters as operation time, need for cervical dilation, adverse events, pain, operator satisfaction; to assess quality of tissue for histological examination; to assess postoperative complications and pain.

Sex

Female

Minimum age

18 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients:

  * Female

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of an intracavitary lesion, according the IETA terms and definitions

* endometrial polyp
* FIGO 0-1 myoma (maximum diameter 2 cm)
* RPOC (maximum diameter 2 cm, no enhanced myometrial vascularity)

Exclusion Criteria:

* • Active vaginal bleeding

  * (possible) malignancy
  * \< 18y
  * Patient refusal
  * Pregnancy
  * Impossibility to access the uterine cavity (e.g. severe cervical stenosis)
  * Absence of intracavitary lesion (endometrial polyp, FIGO 0-1 myoma or RPOC) at hysteroscopy

• BACKGROUNDMunro MG, Christianson LA. Complications of Hysteroscopic and Uterine Resectoscopic Surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;58(4):765-97. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000146. PMID 26457853
• BACKGROUNDShazly SA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Breitkopf DM, Hopkins MR, Burnett TL, Green IC, Farrell AM, Murad MH, Famuyide AO. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Resection for the Treatment of Uterine Cavitary Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 7. PMID 27164165
• BACKGROUNDLee MM, Matsuzono T. Hysteroscopic intrauterine morcellation of submucosal fibroids: preliminary results in Hong Kong and comparisons with conventional hysteroscopic monopolar loop resection. Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Feb;22(1):56-61. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154600. Epub 2016 Jan 8. PMID 26744122
• BACKGROUNDHaber K, Hawkins E, Levie M, Chudnoff S. Hysteroscopic morcellation: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 14. PMID 25128851
• BACKGROUNDThubert T, Foulot H, Vinchant M, Santulli P, Marzouk P, Borghese B, Chapron C. Surgical treatment: Myomectomy and hysterectomy; Endoscopy: A major advancement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jul;34:104-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.021. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PMID 27400649
• BACKGROUNDPakrashi T. New hysteroscopic techniques for submucosal uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;26(4):308-13. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000076. PMID 24950124
• BACKGROUNDVidal-Mazo C, Forero-Diaz C, Lopez-Gonzalez E, Yera-Gilabert M, Machancoses FH. Clinical recurrence of submucosal myoma after a mechanical hysteroscopic myomectomy: Review after 5 years follow up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Dec;243:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Oct 21.