Clinical trial · Interventional
LLLT for BCRL: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study
Large-area Low-level Laser Therapy for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study is conducted to compare between efficacy of large and small area of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treatment of post mastectomy lymphedema. The change of severity of BCRL will be measured by the difference of circumference and skin thickness, detected by ultrasound. The influence on clinical symptoms, such as pain, shoulder mobility and hand function, are also investigated in the study.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer Lymphedema | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional low-level laser therapy | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure) | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Large-area low-level laser therapy
- description
- Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure) was administered at proximal forearm, upper arm and axillary region of affected side. The wavelength was 980±15nm, average dose was 10-40nm/cm2 and maximal output was 1000mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.
- interventionNames
- Device: Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure)
- type
- PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
- label
- Conventional low-level laser therapy
- description
- Conventional low-level laser therapy was administrated on antecubital fossa and the axilla of affected side. The wavelength was 808nm and maximal output was 60 mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.
- interventionNames
- Device: Conventional low-level laser therapy
Primary outcomes (3)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 20 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Female subjects, 20 years age or older, suffered from unilateral breast cancer with ipsilateral lumpectomy or mastectomy and lymph node dissection (sentinel biopsy or axillary dissection) * Stage I or II unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema(as defined by the International Society of Lymphology) * Girth≥ 2 cm circumferential difference compared with the uninvolved upper extremity at any 4 cm segment * Able to commit to a long-term follow-up schedule Exclusion Criteria: * Metastatic cancer(stage IV) * Pregnancy * Presence of other extremity lymphedema (primary or secondary) * History of deep vein thrombosis * Pacemaker * Artificial joints, implant or tattoo(area≥4 cm2) at the involved upper extremity * Previous treatment with low-level laser therapy (within 3 months) * Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 (morbid obesity) * High bleeding tendency(hemophilia) * Receiving long-term steroid treatment (oral or systemic)
References
Publications (11)
- BACKGROUNDDiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):500-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7. Epub 2013 Mar 27. PMID 23540561
- BACKGROUNDGrada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Dec;77(6):1009-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.022. PMID 29132848
- BACKGROUNDEyigor S, Cinar E, Caramat I, Unlu BK. Factors influencing response to lymphedema treatment in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2705-10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2633-9. Epub 2015 Feb 8. PMID 25663541
- BACKGROUNDMellor RH, Bush NL, Stanton AW, Bamber JC, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Dual-frequency ultrasound examination of skin and subcutis thickness in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast J. 2004 Nov-Dec;10(6):496-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21458.x. PMID 15569205
- BACKGROUNDSwenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, Swenson L, Lee MW, Tuttle TM. Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Oct;9(8):745-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02574496. PMID 12374657
- BACKGROUNDVerbelen H, Gebruers N, Eeckhout FM, Verlinden K, Tjalma W. Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2846-5. Epub 2014 Feb 5. PMID 24496928
- BACKGROUNDLee D, Hwang JH, Chu I, Chang HJ, Shim YH, Kim JH. Analysis of factors related to arm weakness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2584-6. Epub 2015 Jan 10.