Clinical trial · Interventional
Efficacy of Response-adapted Treatment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Candidates for Bone Marrow Transplantation
Efficacy of Response-adapted Treatment Guided by Negative Minimal Residual Disease and Negative Imaging (MRDI) in Fit Patients Diagnosed With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Candidates for Bone Marrow Transplantation
NCT05697913CI-TRIAL-00074745unknownN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
To assess whether continued treatment to achieve negative Minimal Residual Disease and Imaging (MRDI(-)) improves therapeutic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The safety evaluation includes the evaluation of adverse events, which are classified according to the Common Criteria for Terminology for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute, version 5.0.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple Myeloma | Multiple Myeloma | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continued treatment adapted to the response | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- MRDI-driven treatment
- description
- Patients continue treatment until complete remission with negative MRD and Image is achieved, changing the therapeutic line if this is not achieved with the prescribed treatment. In this group of patients, treatment is suspended only when this degree of profound response is reached, in any phase of treatment.
- interventionNames
- Other: Continued treatment adapted to the response
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Conventional treatment
- description
- The patients of the conventional treatment group (control group) received six cycles of the induction traetment, bone marrow auto-transplantation, and consolidation treatment after transplantation if complete remission had not been achieved.
Primary outcomes (5)
- measure
- Progression Free Survival
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Younger than 76 years * Diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma from July 1, 2014 to May 31, 2019 * Received some of the standard authorized treatments for their therapeutic line. Patients treated in clinical trials with treatments not yet authorized, for fifth or successive therapeutic lines are admitted. * Give informed consent * Fit patient Exclusion Criteria: * Under 18 years old * Contraindication for bone marrow auto-transplantation * Therapeutic objective only palliative: * Another non-treatable neoplasm * Severe senile dementia * Significant comorbidity limiting life expectancy to less than 6 months
References
Publications (5)
- BACKGROUNDLudwig H, Zojer N. Fixed duration vs continuous therapy in multiple myeloma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):212-222. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.212. PMID 29222258
- BACKGROUNDJackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Wilson JN, Jenner MW, Cook G, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Russell NH, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ; UK NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Dec;6(12):e616-e629. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30167-X. Epub 2019 Oct 14. PMID 31624047
- BACKGROUNDPaiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, Rosinol L, Cordon L, Vidriales MB, Burgos L, Flores-Montero J, Sanoja-Flores L, Lopez-Anglada L, Maldonado R, de la Cruz J, Gutierrez NC, Calasanz MJ, Martin-Ramos ML, Garcia-Sanz R, Martinez-Lopez J, Oriol A, Blanchard MJ, Rios R, Martin J, Martinez-Martinez R, Sureda A, Hernandez MT, de la Rubia J, Krsnik I, Moraleda JM, Palomera L, Bargay J, Van Dongen JJM, Orfao A, Mateos MV, Blade J, San-Miguel JF, Lahuerta JJ; GEM (Grupo Espanol de Mieloma)/PETHEMA (Programa Para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas) Cooperative Study Group. Measurable Residual Disease by Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;38(8):784-792. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01231. Epub 2019 Nov 26. PMID 31770060
- BACKGROUNDKumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, Munshi N, Lonial S, Blade J, Mateos MV, Dimopoulos M, Kastritis E, Boccadoro M, Orlowski R, Goldschmidt H, Spencer A, Hou J, Chng WJ, Usmani SZ, Zamagni E, Shimizu K, Jagannath S, Johnsen HE, Terpos E, Reiman A, Kyle RA, Sonneveld P, Richardson PG, McCarthy P, Ludwig H, Chen W, Cavo M, Harousseau JL, Lentzsch S, Hillengass J, Palumbo A, Orfao A, Rajkumar SV, Miguel JS, Avet-Loiseau H. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6.