Clinical trial · Interventional
Implementation of a Health System Intervention to Improve Quality of Cancer Care for Rural Patients
Effectiveness and Implementation of a Health System Intervention to Improve Quality of Cancer Care for Rural, Underserved Patients
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to implement and evaluate the recently developed Iowa Cancer Affiliate Network (ICAN) intervention. The ICAN intervention will consist of members of the research team providing ongoing support to participating hospitals in achieving the quality standards outlined by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC). Support will be offered in the form of education and training regarding the standards and provision of cancer services, regular in-person and zoom check-ins with hospital stakeholders to evaluate progress, and provision of documentation and educational resources regarding standard requirements. Implementation approach:1) Engage implementation teams and develop and execute implementation plans based on hospital needs assessments; and 2) Conduct interviews with key ICAN stakeholders to assess acceptability, adoption, appropriateness and cost (based on Proctor's implementation outcomes framework) and determinants of these outcomes (e.g., hospital structure, culture, resources, capacity, readiness) based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Evaluation approach: Using Iowa Cancer Registry data routinely collected for surveillance purposes, the investigators will compare rates of compliance with pre- and post-intervention treatment-related quality measures in target and control hospitals. The rural hospitals in Iowa that serve the most rural cancer patients and have never been accredited by the CoC were chosen for intervention targets, and all committed to participating in the study (letters of support provided). The remainder of rural hospitals that care for \>100 newly diagnosed cancer patients per year (n=5) were chosen as a comparison group. The investigators will use data routinely collected by the Iowa Cancer Registry to compare aggregate compliance with quality measures for cancer care between the hospitals included in the intervention and comparison group hospitals using a difference-in-difference estimator. In addition, the investigators will conduct interviews with representatives from intervention hospitals to assess the extent to which ICAN hospitals implemented the CoC standards of cancer care.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | Malignant Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa Cancer Affiliate Network (ICAN) | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Intervention Hospital Administrators, Providers, and Data Monitoring Staff
- description
- This is a health-system-level intervention, designed as two-arm intervention trial, where four participating hospitals will be offered support in the areas of training and education, cancer data collection and reporting, quality improvement and clinical peer-to-peer support. Hospitals that are eligible for the intervention had to be located in an Iowa county classified as non-metropolitan according to rural urban continuum codes (RUCC) 4 through 9 and diagnose or treat at least 100 cancer patients each year. We selected 4 of the 9 rural hospitals meeting this criteria to administer the intervention.
- interventionNames
- Other: Iowa Cancer Affiliate Network (ICAN)
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Control arm
- description
- Hospitals that are eligible for the intervention had to be located in an Iowa county classified as non-metropolitan according to rural urban continuum codes (RUCC) 4 through 9 and diagnose or treat at least 100 cancer patients each year. The remaining 5 hospitals meeting this criteria that were not selected for the intervention will serve as controls.
Primary outcomes (2)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 100 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Administrators, clinicians, and data monitoring staff who help provide cancer related care at one of the four hospitals that have been included in our study. Exclusion Criteria: * None
References
Publications (1)
- DERIVEDSchroeder MC, Birken SA, Lizarraga IM, Kirk MA, Wagi CR, Engelbart JM, Johnson EC, Wahlen MM, Seaman AT, Charlton ME. Application of MODIFI to the adaptation of a complex, multilevel intervention to enhance access to high-quality cancer services in rural cancer hospitals. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Oct 16;6(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00805-x. PMID 41102855