Clinical trial · Observational
Short-term Outcomes of ERAS Protocol in RAME for Esophageal Cancer
Short-term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Robotic-assisted McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
NCT05600335CI-TRIAL-00061912completedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This single-center, retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in perioperative robotic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy (RAME) among esophageal cancer patients.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esophageal Cancer Patients | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERAS protocol | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- ERAS group
- interventionNames
- Procedure: ERAS protocol
- label
- Conventional group
- interventionNames
- Procedure: ERAS protocol
Primary outcomes (9)
- measure
- time to first flatus
- timeFrame
- 2019-2022
- description
- time to first flatus characterized by postoperative outcome
- measure
- time to out-of-bed activity
- timeFrame
- 2019-2022
- description
- time to out-of-bed activity characterized by postoperative outcome
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 20 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. first detected and endoscopically confirmed esophageal cancer; 2. preoperative evaluation showed no distant metastases and suitable for RAME; 3. preoperative clinical stage of I to III; Exclusion Criteria: 1. patients had a history of thoracic or abdominal surgery; 2. patients were IV to VI in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system; 3. patients had other malignancies; 4. patients had missing clinical data
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.