Clinical trial · Observational
Liquid Biopsy for ctDNA in Peritoneal Lavage and Blood in Pancreatic Cancer
Pre- and Postoperative Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Positive Peritoneal Lavage and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a deadly disease and surgical resection of the tumor is the only hope of cure. Approximately 20-25% of the PC patients are candidates for intended curative resection, but despite microscopically radical resection the majority of patients will have recurrent disease within 2 years. This indicates that most patients will harbour non-detected (i.e. occult) cancer cells at the time of resection. Studies suggest that free tumor cells in the peritoneum and in the blood are part of this occult disease burden, and that patients with such findings should not be operated but treated as having metastatic disease. However, the exact incidence of these tumor cells in an unselected cohort of patients undergoing pancreatic resection is unknown, and the potential impact on postoperative survival is also uncertain. In recent years, molecular biomarkers are increasingly being regarded as both predictive and prognostic tools for cancer patients. This study will use the most optimal available methods to investigate the incidence of biomarkers for tumor cells in the peritoneum and blood in PC patients, and to relate these findings to the final outcome of the resected patients. This project has become highly relevant since new treatment methods (i.e. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)) may be used to eradicate free tumor cells. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that PC patients with positive peritoneal cytology (Cy+) had a significant poorer survival than patients with negative peritoneal cytology (Cy-) (HR 3.18), and the authors concluded that Cy+ patients should not undergo surgery. This conclusion was supported by a significant lower overall survival and a higher peritoneal recurrence rate after resection of Cy+ patients when compared to Cy- patients. Agreement that Cy+ in resectable PDAC is a negative predictor of prognosis came from another recent meta-analysis and systematic review. However, this study also indicated that the median OS was worse in patients without than in those with resection among patients with Cy+, thereby emphasizing need of further careful assessment of indications for radical resection in Cy+ patients. KRAS mutations have been detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood (liquid biopsies) from patients with metastatic PC, and ctDNA is considered a marker of poor prognosis. Similar, KRAS mutations were found in the plasma of one-third of patients with a resectable tumor, and ctDNA positive (ctDNA+) patients had a significantly poorer overall survival (13.6 months vs 27.6 months, p\<0.0001). Similar conclusions were drawn in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, while one study failed to confirm these results. The detection of KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA has also been identified as a prognostic biomarker in PC patients. If looking at studies including all stages of PC patients, the prevalence of KRAS mutations in liquid biopsies was 40.8%, and these mutations had a negative impact on overall survival with a HR of 3.16. Different ctDNA detection methods have been used, however the recent introduction of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), a new robust PCR method for quantifying low-abundance point mutations in cell-free circulating DNA, shows promising results and offers increased sensitivity and reproducibility relative to quantitative PCR (qPCR). The treatment of resectable, locally advanced and metastatic PC has changed significantly over the past few years. New chemotherapy regimens have improved survival in metastatic PC, and these regimens (+/- radiation therapy) are presently being tested in both resectable and locally advanced PC with promising preliminary results. In theory, these new regimens may be potentially effective against ctDNA in PC patients, whereas the effect on peritoneal lavage positive (PLF+) PC patients is more speculative due to the low intraperitoneal concentrations of systemic chemotherapy. However, the latter problem may be solved by using Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) which allows better intraperitoneal distribution, concentration and accumulation of chemotherapy, without the systemic side effects. It may be speculated that the highly sensitive ddPCR of KRAS may be a better tool for PLF+ detection when focusing on PC patients, as up to 95% of these harbour mutations in this gene. So far, only very few studies used PCR to evaluate KRAS mutations in PLF in PC patients. Main study aims are: 1. We aim to investigate the incidence of PLF+ and KRAS ctDNA in the blood from an unselected cohort of PC patients scheduled for attempted curative surgery. 2. Secondly, we will study the prognostic impact of PLF+ and KRAS ctDNA positivity in PC patients.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Pancreatic Cancer | Malignant Pancreatic Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Relative frequency of ctDNA in peritoneal lavage and peripheral blood
- timeFrame
- 2 years
- description
- Percentage
Secondary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Prognostic value of ctDNA in peritoneal lavage and peripheral blood
- timeFrame
- 2 years
- description
- Survival
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 20 Years
- Maximum age
- 100 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
* Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (adenocarcinoma) on a pancreatic resection specimen Age \> 18 years Exclusion Criteria: * Duodenal carcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, bile duct cancer * Benign surgical diagnosis * Pregnancy
References
Publications (34)
- BACKGROUNDHruban, R.H., et al., Digestive System Tumours. 2019, World Health Organization: Lyon (France). p. 322-332.
- BACKGROUNDGraversen M, Detlefsen S, Bjerregaard JK, Pfeiffer P, Mortensen MB. Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Clin Exp Metastasis. 2017 Jun;34(5):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s10585-017-9849-7. Epub 2017 May 17. PMID 28516306
- BACKGROUNDSergeant G, Roskams T, van Pelt J, Houtmeyers F, Aerts R, Topal B. Perioperative cancer cell dissemination detected with a real-time RT-PCR assay for EpCAM is not associated with worse prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 31;11:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-47. PMID 21281486
- BACKGROUNDSteen W, Blom R, Busch O, Gerhards M, Besselink M, Dijk F, Festen S. Prognostic value of occult tumor cells obtained by peritoneal lavage in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer and no ascites: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;114(6):743-751. doi: 10.1002/jso.24402. Epub 2016 Sep 19. PMID 27642007
- BACKGROUNDGraversen M, Fristrup C, Kristensen TK, Larsen TR, Pfeiffer P, Mortensen MB, Detlefsen S. Detection of free intraperitoneal tumour cells in peritoneal lavage fluid from patients with peritoneal metastasis before and after treatment with pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). J Clin Pathol. 2019 May;72(5):368-372. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205683. Epub 2019 Feb 12. PMID 30755498
- BACKGROUNDCrepaldi-Filho R, Palma RT, Giusti MF, Bueno Mde A, Silva PS, Waisberg J. Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 in the sera and peritoneal washing of patients undergoing surgical treatment for gastric carcinoma. Arq Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul-Sep;45(3):219-24. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032008000300010. PMID 18852950
- BACKGROUNDHoskovec D, Varga J, Konecna E, Antos F. Levels of CEA and Ca 19 - 9 in the sera and peritoneal cavity in patients with gastric and pancreatic cancers. Acta Cir Bras. 2012 Jun;27(6):410-6. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502012000600009.