Clinical trial · Interventional
Patient-Reported Erectile Recovery and Quality of Life Outcomes With Lyopreserved Placental Tissue Applied Directly Over Neurovascular Bundle During Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Standard of Care
Patient-Reported Erectile Recovery and Quality of Life Outcomes With Lyopreserved Placental Tissue Applied Directly Over Neurovascular Bundle During Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Standard of Care
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): The sponsor was unable to produce and provide the study material (stravix)
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Surgical implantation of Lyopreserved Placental Tissue (LPT) is FDA approved and has been used extensively in wound care. The use is expanding and more recently, LPT has been used in the management of diabetic foot ulcers, acute and chronic surgical wounds, various fistulas and even as a nerve wrap on the common peroneal nerve. Surgical technique for nerve-sparing prostatectomy has evolved continuously since first described by Walsh in 1982 and is now commonly performed with robotic assistance. The investigators intend to study whether placement of LPT over the spared neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy will improve return to potency and/or continence after robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patients with a preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score \> 19 (moderate or high pre-op sexual function) planning to undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy will be randomized to receive direct placement of LPT over the preserved neurovascular bundles vs standard of care. Patients will independently report erectile function and continence at 1 months, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Primary outcomes would include mean time to achieve potency, percentage of group achieving potency at each time point, and mean change in SHIM score. Secondary outcomes would include mean time to achieve continence. The investigators will also report any adverse events.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate Cancer | Malignant Prostate Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radical prostatectomy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Stravix lyopreserved placental tissue (LPT) | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Stravix
- description
- Direct placement of LPT over the spared neurovascular bundles during bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
- interventionNames
- Drug: Stravix lyopreserved placental tissue (LPT)
- type
- SHAM_COMPARATOR
- label
- Standard of Care
- description
- Standard care (no placement of tissue) bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Radical prostatectomy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Change in Erectile Function as Assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 40 Years
- Maximum age
- 65 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Male sex 40 to 65 years of age with localized prostate cancer (clinical stage less than or equal to T2a, Gleason grade less than or equal to 3+4=7 (Gleason 8 or 4+3=7 will be excluded), Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) less than or equal to 10 ng/mL)
2. Scheduled to undergo curative radical prostatectomy applying bilateral nerve-sparing procedure
3. Intact pre-surgical erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function \[IIEF\]-5 / Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score greater than or equal to 18)
4. Willingness to attempt intercourse at least 5 times per month following surgery.
5. Has a sexual partner of at least 6 months with current sexual activity (within the past 4 weeks)
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Known penile deformity or a history of Peyronie's disease
2. Pre or postoperative androgen therapy
3. Pre or postoperative radiation therapy
4. History of high or low blood pressure that is not controlled
5. Taking nitrates medications
6. History of heart problems such as angina, heart failure, irregular heartbeats, or myocardial infarction
7. History of drug or alcohol abuse
8. Current smoker has a 20 pack/year history of cigarette smoking
9. History of acute or chronic depression
10. History of liver problems or kidney problems
11. History of retinitis pigmentosa or severe vision loss, including a condition called NAION
12. History of spinal trauma or surgery to the brain or spinal cord
13. Other contraindications to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE) 5 inhibitors
14. History of known sensitivities to any of the following reagents used for processing, disinfection, and storage, which may remain on the product:
* Lyopreservation Solution: 18.9% w/v Trehalose in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline
* Disinfection Solution: 0.5% v/v Gentamicin Sulfate, 0.1% v/v Vancomycin reconstituted in Water for Injection (WFI), 1% v/v Amphotericin B, 98.4% Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM)
* Processing Solution: DMEM, Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (dPBS), 11% Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution in Saline, Formula A (ACD-A), 1.7% w/v Trehalose in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered SalineReferences
Publications (4)
- BACKGROUNDPatel VR, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Kumar A, Coelho R, Rocco B, Palmer K. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allograft Nerve Wrap Around the Prostatic Neurovascular Bundle Accelerates Early Return to Continence and Potency Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):977-980. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 19. PMID 25613153
- BACKGROUNDJohnson EL, Marshall JT, Michael GM. A comparative outcomes analysis evaluating clinical effectiveness in two different human placental membrane products for wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):145-149. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12503. Epub 2017 Jan 19. PMID 27997744
- BACKGROUNDRodriguez-Collazo E, Tamire Y. Open surgical implantation of a viable cryopreserved placental membrane after decompression and neurolysis of common peroneal nerve: a case series. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jun 12;12(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0587-y. PMID 28606158
- BACKGROUNDTaylor JP, Gearhart S. The use of viable cryopreserved placental tissue in the management of a chronic rectovaginal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Nov;99(8):e236-e240. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0157. Epub 2017 Oct 19. PMID 29046080