Clinical trial · Interventional
Comparison of Subtotal Stomach and Narrow Gastric Tube After Esophagectomy
Comparison of Subtotal Stomach and Narrow Gastric Tube for Reconstruction After Esophagectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Control Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Currently, both the subtotal stomach and narrow gastric tube approaches are widely used for esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. Some stud- ies have concluded that the subtotal gastric conduit is superior to the wide gastric-tube approach, as it provides better protection of the submucosal vessels and can slightly increase gastric capacity. Furthermore, blood perfusion significantly decreases after tubular gastric surgery.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esophageal Cancer | Malignant Esophageal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Narrow gastric tube | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Subtotal stomach
- description
- The vessels at the anastomosis of right and left gastric arteries were separated, then the proximal haft of lesser curvature and cardia was resected using linear staplers.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Narrow gastric tube
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Narrow gastric tube
- description
- At the lesser curvature, the resection began at the point that was 5-cm from the pyloric, toward to the greater curvature, then the stomach was divided along 3 cm from the greater curvature using linear stapler.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Narrow gastric tube
Primary outcomes (8)
- measure
- Early complications (30-day complications): rate of anastomotic leakage
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologic finding by esophageal endoscopy: confirmed esophageal cancer. * Indication for esophagectomy * Age: 18 - 80 year old * Tumor located at the middle or lower third of the esophagus * ASA score: ≤ 3 * Informed consent patients (explanation about our clinical trials is provided to the patients or patrons, if patient is not available) Exclusion Criteria: * Concurrent cancer or patient who was treated due to other cancer before the patient was diagnosed esophageal cancer * Pregnant patient * Using colon or intesinal conduit
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available