Clinical trial · Interventional
EMR Versus ESD for Barrett's Neoplasia
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic subMucosal Dissection fOr Removal of Visible Lesions in Barrett's Esophagus With Early Neoplasia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Rationale: The optimal technique for removal of visible dysplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is safe, effective, easy to apply, and has been the most widely used technique since 2008. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a more controlled dissection method with potential improved efficacy, but at the cost of higher technical complexity. Objective: The investigators aim to compare EMR and ESD for removal of visible lesions in Barrett's esophagus. Study design: Randomized clinical trial Study population: Patients with Barrett's esophagus and a visible lesion with dysplasia and/or early cancer. Suspicion for submucosal invasion is an exclusion criterion. Intervention: Patients are randomized to receive either EMR or ESD, with follow-up and no ablation during 12 months after the resection. Main study endpoint: Primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with no evidence of residual or local recurrent neoplasia during 12 months follow-up after baseline.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrett Adenocarcinoma | Barrett Adenocarcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Esophageal Cancer | Malignant Esophageal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMR | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
| ESD | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection
- interventionNames
- Other: ESD
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Endoscopic mucosal resection
- interventionNames
- Other: EMR
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with no evidence of residual or local recurrent neoplasia during 12 months follow-up after baseline.
- timeFrame
- 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients age: ≥ 18 years
* Willingness to undergo both EMR or ESD
* Ability to provide written, informed consent (approved by IRB) and understand the responsibilities of trial participation
* BE with at least one visible lesion ("target lesion") with absence of signs of submucosal invasion on endoscopy, after evaluation by the adjudication committee
* Multiple lesions are allowed as long as the lesions are considered eligible for endoscopic treatment. Only the target lesion is evaluated for the study
* Prior endoscopic resection is allowed
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients with visible lesions with suspicion of submucosal invasion based on assessment of the adjudication committee
* Patients with HGD in at least one random biopsy, before inclusion (i.e. during endoscopy in the referring center \<3 months before imaging, or during imaging endoscopy)
* History of esophageal surgery other than fundoplication
* History of esophageal ablation therapy
* In case of prior endoscopic resection, the target lesion located within 1 cm of the prior resection site
* Uncontrolled coagulopathy with INR \>2.0, thrombocytopenia with platelet counts \< 50,000
* Esophageal varix or varices
* Subject has a known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up guidelines
* Life expectancy \<2 yearsReferences
Publications (0)
Data not yet available