Clinical trial · Observational
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885CI-TRIAL-00056314unknownClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the differences of oncological in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or transanal endoscopy radical resection. The secondary purpose is to compare the effect of two different surgical methods on prognosis.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectum Cancer | Rectal Carcinoma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
No intervention recorded.
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- laparoscopic surgery
- description
- Different surgical methods for rectal cancer resection
- label
- Transanal endoscopic surgery
- description
- Different surgical methods for rectal cancer resection
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- The positive rate of oncological contamination of peritoneal washings
- timeFrame
- 1 years
- description
- Determination of tumor cell positive rate by tumor cell examination of peritoneal washings
Secondary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Disease free survival
- timeFrame
- 3 years
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Primary rectal carcinoma * Single lesion * No metastasis Exclusion Criteria: * History of malignant tumors * Acute bowel obstruction, bleeding or perforation * Tumor over 6cm in diameter or in severe adhesion with surrounded tissues * Severe other contradictions of surgery * Pregnant women will be excluded
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.