Clinical trial · Interventional
Erector Spinae Block Versus Caudal Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Cancer Patients
Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block and Ultrasound Guided Caudal for Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Cancer Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy Surgeries: a Randomized Controlled Study
NCT05153720CI-TRIAL-00081005completedN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The study aim to compare ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound guided caudal block in perioperative analgesia for pediatric cancer patients
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analgesia | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caudal block | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Erector spinae plane block | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block
- description
- Unilateral erector spinae plane block will be performed under ultrasound guidance
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Erector spinae plane block
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Ultrasound guided caudal block
- description
- Caudal block will be formed under ultrasound guidance
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Caudal block
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- opioid consumption
- timeFrame
- First 24 hours postoperatively
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 1 Year
- Maximum age
- 12 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * ASA I and II * Age \>1 and \<12 * patients undergoing nephrectomy surgeries Exclusion Criteria: * patients parental refusal * local infection at the puncture site * coagulopathy with INR\> 1.6 * unstable cardiovascular disease * patients allergic to medication used * development or mental delay * impaired liver and renal functions
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.