Clinical trial · Interventional
Comparison Capsule Sparing Cystectomy and Radical Cystoprostatectomy in Men with Bladder Cancer
A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Oncology Outcome and Functional Recovery of Capsule Sparing Cystectomy and Radical Cystoprostatectomy with Detaenial Sigmoid Neobladder in Men Suffering from Bladder Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system, radical resection plus urinary diversion is the first choice of treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urinary diversion of surgical options related to patient'survival and quality of life. In 2000, professor Chunxiao Liu invented "detaenial sigmoid neobladder", this surgical method overset the traditional intestinal detubularization approach, which detached the serosal layer with smooth muscle from the bowel without split it. This kind of neobladder is easier to construct and have less impact on intestinal function. So far, it has been implemented for more than 700 cases in Zhujiang hospital, the age of patients range from 9 months (bladder rhabdomyosarcoma) to 88 years old. The filed of standard radical bladder cancer resection includes the structure of the prostate and seminal vesicles. More and more studies and long-term clinical experience in our hospital have confirmed that capsule sparing cystectomy can achieve good tumor control and excellent functional recovery. Our project is going to perform a randomized controlled trial for capsule sparing cystectomy and conventional radical cystoprostatectomy and look forward to assess the oncology outcome and functional recovery of these two procedures which provide an objective basis for the patients undergoing orthotopic urinary diversion in the future.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder Cancer | Malignant Bladder Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capsule Sparing Cystectomy (CSC) | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Conventional Radical Cystoprostatectomy (CRC) | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Capsule Sparing Cystectomy
- description
- Patients undergoing transurethral resection and enucleation of the prostate before laparoscopic cystectomy
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Capsule Sparing Cystectomy (CSC)
- type
- PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
- label
- Conventional Radical Cystoprostatectomy
- description
- Patients undergoing conventional radical cystoprostatectomy
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Conventional Radical Cystoprostatectomy (CRC)
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Post-operative urinary function
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 20 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult males aged 20 and above and healthy volunteers are not accepted; * Bladder carcinoma in situ、T1G3 tumor、muscle invasive bladder cancer with clinical stage of cT2-T3N0M0 (If the clinical staging before neoadjuvant therapy meets the inclusion criteria, patients who have decreased to below cT2 after neoadjuvant therapy can also choose to be included according to the patient's wishes). * Recurrent bladder cancer: recurrent NMIBC after treatment and Carcinoma in situ that does not respond to BCG vaccine treatment. * ECOG score is 0 or 1. * Voluntarily signed the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Preoperative serum creatinine more than 2.26mg/dl Or 200μmol/L. * Cancer invaded prostate or urethral (confirmed by the pathology). * Patients with distant metastasis. * Abnormal PSA level, or suspected patients with unconfirmed prostate cancer . * A history of other malignant tumors within three years. * sigmoid chronic inflammation, like ulcerative colitis or intestinal tuberculosis, and so on. * Severe cardiopulmonary and liver dysfunction, combined with other serious diseases * Other conditions that have been approved by a urologist for not suitable for neobladder surgery.
References
Publications (12)
- BACKGROUNDSiegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12. PMID 35020204
- BACKGROUNDWitjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, Hernandez V, Linares Espinos E, Lorch A, Neuzillet Y, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Veskimae E, Ribal MJ, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29. PMID 32360052
- BACKGROUNDXu K, Liu CX, Zheng SB, Li HL, Xu YW, Xu AB, Chen BS, Shen HY. Orthotopic detaenial sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: technical considerations, complications and functional outcomes. J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):928-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.072. Epub 2013 Mar 26. PMID 23538237
- BACKGROUNDXu A, Li B, Li H, Zheng S, Du W, Xu Y, Zou Y, Luo Q, Liu C. Comparison of seromuscular tunnel and split-cuff nipple antireflux ureteroenteral anastomosis techniques in orthotopic taenia myectomy sigmoid neobladder: a prospective, randomized study. Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.018. Epub 2013 Jan 3. PMID 23290142
- BACKGROUNDXu P, Chen C, Chen B, Bi E, Du W, Jiang N, Liu Z, Lan H, Cao M, Liu Y, Huang J, Shen H, Liu C, Liu C, Xu A. Long-term Follow-up of Detaenial Sigmoid Neobladder Reconstruction for Paediatric Patients with Bladder and Prostate Rhabdomyosarcoma: Technique and Results from a Single High-volume Centre. Eur Urol. 2022 Nov;82(5):543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.015. Epub 2022 Aug 30. PMID 36050131
- BACKGROUNDJacobs BL, Daignault S, Lee CT, Hafez KS, Montgomery JS, Montie JE, Humrich JE, Hollenbeck BK, Wood DP Jr, Weizer AZ. Prostate capsule sparing versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.090. Epub 2014 Jul 24.