Clinical trial · Observational
Cohort Study Comparing Surgeon Stress, Utilization of Surgical Instruments, Surgical Outcomes According to Surgical Approach for Gastrectomy
NCT04972149CI-TRIAL-00052901unknownClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
A new surgical instrument is supposed to allow surgeon to do surgery with better performance. However, the learning period before getting used to the new instruments is necessary. The surgeon's stress to overcome the learning effect and the surgical outcome was rarely assessed. The comparative analysis of surgical outcome, surgeon's stress, and utilization of instruments for gastrectomy will be performed in prospective cohort study
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
No intervention recorded.
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (6)
- label
- LC
- description
- laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments
- label
- LW
- description
- Using wristed laparoscopic instruments (Artisential Maryland dissector, Artisential Fenestrated grasper)
- label
- RC
- description
- Conventional robotic surgery
- label
- RSS
- description
- Use of single site system for reduced port robotic surgery
- label
- RSP
- description
- Use of da Vinci SP system for reduced port robotic surgery
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Maximum age
- 90 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with gastric cancer scheduled for gastrectomy Exclusion Criteria: Vulnerable subject (illiterate, pregnant)
References
Publications (13)
- BACKGROUNDGrantcharov PD, Boillat T, Elkabany S, Wac K, Rivas H. Acute mental stress and surgical performance. BJS Open. 2018 Sep 27;3(1):119-125. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.104. eCollection 2019 Feb. PMID 30734023
- BACKGROUNDJeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30. PMID 22076206
- BACKGROUNDKim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b. PMID 20160637
- BACKGROUNDKim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1. PMID 23207683
- BACKGROUNDKitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8. PMID 8180768
- BACKGROUNDLee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248. PMID 22318810
- BACKGROUNDLee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.